← 研踪 PaperTrailarXiv:2605.06505 · v3
PACZero: PAC-Private Fine-Tuning of Language Models via Sign Quantization
首次提交 2026-05-08 00:20
版本更新 2026-11-06 16:59
雷达观测 2026-11-09 11:19
摘要
Differentially private (DP) zeroth-order (ZO) fine-tuning of large language models (LLMs) inherits DP's harsh utility-privacy trade-off. PAC Privacy, an instance-based notion, offers an alternative. It bounds the mutual information (MI) between the secret input and the output, and calibrates the noise to the stability of the output under the input distribution. We introduce PACZero, a family of ZO fine-tuning mechanisms under PAC Privacy. For stability, PACZero quantizes each update to a single bit, the sign of the ZO update aggregated over the secret subset of the training data. On many steps all candidate subsets agree on this sign, so the bit can be released at no cost in MI. On the remaining steps the bit passes through a noisy channel calibrated to a per-step MI budget. We study two channels, the standard additive Gaussian channel of PAC Privacy (PACZero-AGC) and a binary asymmetric channel with optimal bit flipping (PACZero-BAC), along with their zero-budget versions at $\mathrm{MI} \to 0$, PACZero-AGC$_0$ and PACZero-BAC$_0$. At zero MI, nothing released during training, including the fine-tuned model, carries any information about which secret subset was sampled, so no adversary inferring that subset can do better than its prior. In particular, the success rate of any membership inference attack (MIA) is bounded by 50% under a balanced prior. To our knowledge, this is the first such guarantee for LLM fine-tuning, and DP matches the MIA bound only at $\varepsilon = δ= 0$ and infinite noise. We evaluate on SST-2 and SQuAD with models from 1.3B to 8B parameters, under LoRA and full fine-tuning. Both channels retain high utility under tight MI budgets, and even PACZero-BAC$_0$, which guarantees zero MI, stays within 2 points of non-private ZO fine-tuning with the same number of steps. To our knowledge no DP method achieves usable utility matching this MIA-resistance level.
作者备注：Accepted at NeurIPS 2026. Code: https://github.com/bilgehanertan/paczero-bac
观测到的版本
相邻记录可能跳过中间版本；首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。
v3 · 2026-11-06 16:59 · 最新观测版本
PACZero: PAC-Private Fine-Tuning of Language Models via Sign Quantization
Differentially private (DP) zeroth-order (ZO) fine-tuning of large language models (LLMs) inherits DP's harsh utility-privacy trade-off. PAC Privacy, an instance-based notion, offers an alternative. It bounds the mutual information (MI) between the secret input and the output, and calibrates the noise to the stability of the output under the input distribution. We introduce PACZero, a family of ZO fine-tuning mechanisms under PAC Privacy. For stability, PACZero quantizes each update to a single bit, the sign of the ZO update aggregated over the secret subset of the training data. On many steps all candidate subsets agree on this sign, so the bit can be released at no cost in MI. On the remaining steps the bit passes through a noisy channel calibrated to a per-step MI budget. We study two channels, the standard additive Gaussian channel of PAC Privacy (PACZero-AGC) and a binary asymmetric channel with optimal bit flipping (PACZero-BAC), along with their zero-budget versions at $\mathrm{MI} \to 0$, PACZero-AGC$_0$ and PACZero-BAC$_0$. At zero MI, nothing released during training, including the fine-tuned model, carries any information about which secret subset was sampled, so no adversary inferring that subset can do better than its prior. In particular, the success rate of any membership inference attack (MIA) is bounded by 50% under a balanced prior. To our knowledge, this is the first such guarantee for LLM fine-tuning, and DP matches the MIA bound only at $\varepsilon = δ= 0$ and infinite noise. We evaluate on SST-2 and SQuAD with models from 1.3B to 8B parameters, under LoRA and full fine-tuning. Both channels retain high utility under tight MI budgets, and even PACZero-BAC$_0$, which guarantees zero MI, stays within 2 points of non-private ZO fine-tuning with the same number of steps. To our knowledge no DP method achieves usable utility matching this MIA-resistance level.
查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗