← 研踪 PaperTrailarXiv:2605.07139 · v2
Structural Rationale Distillation via Reasoning Space Compression
首次提交 2026-05-08 10:15
版本更新 2026-11-04 10:18
雷达观测 2026-11-05 11:11
摘要
When distilling reasoning from large language models (LLMs) into smaller ones, teacher rationales for similar problems often vary wildly in structure and strategy. Like a chef who makes the same dish differently each time, this inconsistency burdens the student with noisy supervision that is hard to internalize. We propose Distillation through Reasoning Path Compression (D-RPC), which constrains the teacher to follow a compact, dynamically maintained bank of reusable high-level reasoning paths. For each training question, D-RPC retrieves the most relevant path and conditions the teacher to follow it, producing rationales that are consistent across similar problems yet diverse enough to cover different problem types. A PAC-Bayes analysis formalizes a trade-off between bank size and coverage, with smaller banks limiting path diversity at the risk of coverage gaps. Our ablations favor an intermediate bank size, consistent with this trade-off. Across five math and commonsense reasoning benchmarks with two student models, D-RPC achieves the highest average accuracy among the evaluated distillation methods, while using fewer tokens than template-heavy alternatives.
作者备注：NeurIPS 2026
观测到的版本
相邻记录可能跳过中间版本；首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。
v2 · 2026-11-04 10:18 · 最新观测版本
Structural Rationale Distillation via Reasoning Space Compression
When distilling reasoning from large language models (LLMs) into smaller ones, teacher rationales for similar problems often vary wildly in structure and strategy. Like a chef who makes the same dish differently each time, this inconsistency burdens the student with noisy supervision that is hard to internalize. We propose Distillation through Reasoning Path Compression (D-RPC), which constrains the teacher to follow a compact, dynamically maintained bank of reusable high-level reasoning paths. For each training question, D-RPC retrieves the most relevant path and conditions the teacher to follow it, producing rationales that are consistent across similar problems yet diverse enough to cover different problem types. A PAC-Bayes analysis formalizes a trade-off between bank size and coverage, with smaller banks limiting path diversity at the risk of coverage gaps. Our ablations favor an intermediate bank size, consistent with this trade-off. Across five math and commonsense reasoning benchmarks with two student models, D-RPC achieves the highest average accuracy among the evaluated distillation methods, while using fewer tokens than template-heavy alternatives.
查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗