跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2605.10613 · v2

Exact Fixed-Point Constraints in Neural-ODEs: Injecting Prior Knowledge into the Network Parameters

首次提交 2026-05-11 22:10
版本更新 2026-11-12 17:43
雷达观测 2026-11-13 14:15
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Neural ordinary differential equations (Neural-ODEs) learn a velocity field from data. Often, however, additional information on the target field is available, such as the location of some of its equilibria or, more generally, its values at given points. We introduce a method to inject this information directly into the parameters of a Neural-ODE, so that a finite set of prescribed fixed points holds exactly throughout training, with no penalty terms and no post-hoc projection. The output matrix is parametrized through the Moore-Penrose pseudoinverse, implemented by a thin QR factorization of the hidden features at the prescribed points. This splits the output matrix into a component determined by the constraints and a free one, which shapes the field away from the prescribed points without altering its values there. As a result, the constrained Neural-ODE remains a universal approximator of the continuous vector fields compatible with the constraints. We test the method on a two-dimensional Lotka-Volterra competition model with four equilibria. In vector field regression, the constrained model keeps the fixed-point residual at single-precision round-off, and its test error is up to about five times lower than that of an unconstrained network of the same architecture. A soft penalty on the equilibria lowers the residual only at the cost of accuracy, and still leaves it at least an order of magnitude above that of the constrained model. Trained to convergence on datasets of increasing size, the unconstrained and penalized networks saturate already on small datasets, while the constrained model keeps improving over a wider range. Close to the equilibria and over long time horizons, the constrained model is the most accurate at every dataset size considered. This also holds when the models are trained on observed trajectories, by backpropagation through the ODE solver.

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

本站首次收录为 v2,暂无更早版本可对照。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v2 · 2026-11-12 17:43 · 最新观测版本

Exact Fixed-Point Constraints in Neural-ODEs: Injecting Prior Knowledge into the Network Parameters

Neural ordinary differential equations (Neural-ODEs) learn a velocity field from data. Often, however, additional information on the target field is available, such as the location of some of its equilibria or, more generally, its values at given points. We introduce a method to inject this information directly into the parameters of a Neural-ODE, so that a finite set of prescribed fixed points holds exactly throughout training, with no penalty terms and no post-hoc projection. The output matrix is parametrized through the Moore-Penrose pseudoinverse, implemented by a thin QR factorization of the hidden features at the prescribed points. This splits the output matrix into a component determined by the constraints and a free one, which shapes the field away from the prescribed points without altering its values there. As a result, the constrained Neural-ODE remains a universal approximator of the continuous vector fields compatible with the constraints. We test the method on a two-dimensional Lotka-Volterra competition model with four equilibria. In vector field regression, the constrained model keeps the fixed-point residual at single-precision round-off, and its test error is up to about five times lower than that of an unconstrained network of the same architecture. A soft penalty on the equilibria lowers the residual only at the cost of accuracy, and still leaves it at least an order of magnitude above that of the constrained model. Trained to convergence on datasets of increasing size, the unconstrained and penalized networks saturate already on small datasets, while the constrained model keeps improving over a wider range. Close to the equilibria and over long time horizons, the constrained model is the most accurate at every dataset size considered. This also holds when the models are trained on observed trajectories, by backpropagation through the ODE solver.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗