跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2606.02618 · v2

Closed-Loop Molecular Design with Calibrated Deference

首次提交 2026-05-28 00:44
版本更新 2026-11-11 03:03
雷达观测 2026-11-13 11:12
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

As AI systems become increasingly capable scientific collaborators, a fundamental challenge that arises is not only generating explanations, but calibrating confidence in them. We present Discovery, a multi-agent scientific system designed to assess the reliability of tools and data during adaptive reasoning, track evidence and assumptions while resolving uncertainty using a persistent graph memory. Discovery enables a capability we term calibrated deference: the ability to adjust confidence in its tool use, assumptions, and mechanistic explanations based on these assessments, communicate uncertainty to human collaborators, and adapt strategies accordingly. We evaluated Discovery in a closed-loop human-AI campaign to design an aqueous organic redox flow battery negative electrolyte. Discovery proposed candidates and interpreted results in collaboration with chemists, who synthesized, characterized, and guided design. Across 17 candidates over three rounds, Discovery converged on a candidate with a redox potential improved by 130 mV relative to the literature baseline. However, experimental characterization revealed poor electrochemical reversibility that the predictors used in the campaign could not anticipate. In response, Discovery generated competing mechanistic hypotheses, prioritized discriminating diagnostics, and traced the behavior to phosphonate-potassium ion pairing. Discovery designed a sulfonate analog to reduce potassium-ion pairing, and the resulting compound improved electrochemical reversibility while maintaining a 90 mV improvement in redox potential, closing the design-make-test-redesign loop. Across the campaign, Discovery demonstrated the ability to maintain a coherent world model, updating in response to unexpected results, and leverage it to drive molecular design.

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v2 · 2026-11-11 03:03 · 最新观测版本

Closed-Loop Molecular Design with Calibrated Deference

As AI systems become increasingly capable scientific collaborators, a fundamental challenge that arises is not only generating explanations, but calibrating confidence in them. We present Discovery, a multi-agent scientific system designed to assess the reliability of tools and data during adaptive reasoning, track evidence and assumptions while resolving uncertainty using a persistent graph memory. Discovery enables a capability we term calibrated deference: the ability to adjust confidence in its tool use, assumptions, and mechanistic explanations based on these assessments, communicate uncertainty to human collaborators, and adapt strategies accordingly. We evaluated Discovery in a closed-loop human-AI campaign to design an aqueous organic redox flow battery negative electrolyte. Discovery proposed candidates and interpreted results in collaboration with chemists, who synthesized, characterized, and guided design. Across 17 candidates over three rounds, Discovery converged on a candidate with a redox potential improved by 130 mV relative to the literature baseline. However, experimental characterization revealed poor electrochemical reversibility that the predictors used in the campaign could not anticipate. In response, Discovery generated competing mechanistic hypotheses, prioritized discriminating diagnostics, and traced the behavior to phosphonate-potassium ion pairing. Discovery designed a sulfonate analog to reduce potassium-ion pairing, and the resulting compound improved electrochemical reversibility while maintaining a 90 mV improvement in redox potential, closing the design-make-test-redesign loop. Across the campaign, Discovery demonstrated the ability to maintain a coherent world model, updating in response to unexpected results, and leverage it to drive molecular design.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗