← 研踪 PaperTrailarXiv:2606.03210 · v2
Differentiable FEM versus PINN for pavement layer inverse analysis: enforcing physics as hard or soft constraints
首次提交 2026-06-02 14:08
版本更新 2026-10-26 09:30
雷达观测 2026-10-29 00:36
摘要
Automatic-differentiation-based inverse analysis methods, including physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) and differentiable programming, have recently shown great promise due to their ability to compute accurate gradients and convergence efficiency. However, their applicability to falling weight deflectometer (FWD) backcalculation remains unexplored. This study critically evaluates PINN-based inverse analysis for a multilayer pavement system and investigates differentiable finite element method (DiffFEM) as an alternative based on a synthetic benchmark. The standard PINN does not recover layer moduli because of the sharp domain discontinuities inherent to layered pavement systems. Although we use an extended PINN with domain decomposition (XPINN), which shows better performance on discontinuous domains, its performance remains highly sensitive to loss weighting and network architecture, and degrades under measurement noise. By contrast, DiffFEM consistently achieves more accurate, stable, and computationally efficient inversion results. These results show and quantify the expected advantage of DiffFEM, which enforces the governing physics as a hard constraint in the solver, over PINN-based approaches, where the governing physics is imposed as a soft constraint through the loss function. More broadly, the findings suggest that the choice between PINN- and DiffFEM-based inverse analysis needs careful consideration, with DiffFEM offering practical advantages when an efficient and robust differentiable forward solver is available.
期刊信息：Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, Vol. 51, 100251 (2026)
观测到的版本
相邻记录可能跳过中间版本；首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。
v2 · 2026-10-26 09:30 · 最新观测版本
Differentiable FEM versus PINN for pavement layer inverse analysis: enforcing physics as hard or soft constraints
Automatic-differentiation-based inverse analysis methods, including physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) and differentiable programming, have recently shown great promise due to their ability to compute accurate gradients and convergence efficiency. However, their applicability to falling weight deflectometer (FWD) backcalculation remains unexplored. This study critically evaluates PINN-based inverse analysis for a multilayer pavement system and investigates differentiable finite element method (DiffFEM) as an alternative based on a synthetic benchmark. The standard PINN does not recover layer moduli because of the sharp domain discontinuities inherent to layered pavement systems. Although we use an extended PINN with domain decomposition (XPINN), which shows better performance on discontinuous domains, its performance remains highly sensitive to loss weighting and network architecture, and degrades under measurement noise. By contrast, DiffFEM consistently achieves more accurate, stable, and computationally efficient inversion results. These results show and quantify the expected advantage of DiffFEM, which enforces the governing physics as a hard constraint in the solver, over PINN-based approaches, where the governing physics is imposed as a soft constraint through the loss function. More broadly, the findings suggest that the choice between PINN- and DiffFEM-based inverse analysis needs careful consideration, with DiffFEM offering practical advantages when an efficient and robust differentiable forward solver is available.
查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗