跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2606.27895 · v2

Mosaic: A Benchmark Suite for Differentiable Physics Solvers

首次提交 2026-06-26 17:38
版本更新 2026-11-09 20:46
雷达观测 2026-11-10 15:22
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Differentiable partial differential equation (PDE) solvers underpin solver-in-the-loop MLtraining, gradient-based optimal control, and inverse problems, yet the practical cost of obtaining correct, usable gradients from a given solver on a given problem is largely undocumented. Integration effort, computational cost, memory, gradient accuracy, and numerical stability vary widely across solvers and are discoverable only by trial and error. We introduce Mosaic, an extensible benchmarking framework for differentiable PDE solvers that standardizes access to solver gradients. Each solver is packaged as a containerized component (Tesseract) exposing a uniform gradient API regardless of language or automatic differentiation (AD) strategy, enabling researchers to evaluate, compare, and build on non-trivial physical solvers. Our evaluation of 14 solvers across fluid dynamics, structural mechanics, and heat transfer demonstrates that the benchmark surfaces practically relevant differences: order-of-magnitude variation in computational cost and memory, alongside setup incompatibilities and instabilities that rule out solvers for specific tasks. Despite this variation, all solvers that produce gradients converge to similar optima on our tasks, indicating that the practical barriers are memory limits, numerical stability, and setup compatibility rather than gradient accuracy alone. Mosaic is open-source and available at github.com/pasteurlabs/mosaic.

作者备注:37 pages, 18 figures, 11 tables. NeurIPS 2026 Evaluations and Datasets Track. Code available at https://github.com/pasteurlabs/mosaic

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

本站首次收录为 v2,暂无更早版本可对照。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v2 · 2026-11-09 20:46 · 最新观测版本

Mosaic: A Benchmark Suite for Differentiable Physics Solvers

Differentiable partial differential equation (PDE) solvers underpin solver-in-the-loop MLtraining, gradient-based optimal control, and inverse problems, yet the practical cost of obtaining correct, usable gradients from a given solver on a given problem is largely undocumented. Integration effort, computational cost, memory, gradient accuracy, and numerical stability vary widely across solvers and are discoverable only by trial and error. We introduce Mosaic, an extensible benchmarking framework for differentiable PDE solvers that standardizes access to solver gradients. Each solver is packaged as a containerized component (Tesseract) exposing a uniform gradient API regardless of language or automatic differentiation (AD) strategy, enabling researchers to evaluate, compare, and build on non-trivial physical solvers. Our evaluation of 14 solvers across fluid dynamics, structural mechanics, and heat transfer demonstrates that the benchmark surfaces practically relevant differences: order-of-magnitude variation in computational cost and memory, alongside setup incompatibilities and instabilities that rule out solvers for specific tasks. Despite this variation, all solvers that produce gradients converge to similar optima on our tasks, indicating that the practical barriers are memory limits, numerical stability, and setup compatibility rather than gradient accuracy alone. Mosaic is open-source and available at github.com/pasteurlabs/mosaic.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗