跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2607.18220 · v2

Approximate Envy-Freeness and Pareto Optimality Beyond Additivity

首次提交 2026-07-21 01:54
版本更新 2026-10-28 01:53
雷达观测 2026-10-29 00:34
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

We study the compatibility of envy-freeness up to one good (EF1) and Pareto optimality (PO) beyond additive valuations. For two agents with monotone submodular valuations, we prove that a $2/3$-EF1+PO allocation always exists, while for every $α>3/4$, an $α$-EF1+PO allocation may fail to exist even for unweighted coverage valuations. A six-good EF1+PO counterexample resolves the longstanding exact existence question negatively. Exact EF1+PO does exist when one agent has a monotone submodular valuation and the remaining agents have identical additive valuations. For two agents, we also establish tight EF$k$+PO item thresholds of $4k+1$, $2k+1$, and $3k+1$ for two submodular agents, two subadditive agents, and one subadditive and one additive agent, respectively. Finally, deciding whether an EF$k$+PO allocation exists is NP-hard for every fixed integer $k\ge1$, even for three agents with unweighted coverage valuations, one of whom has an additive valuation.

作者备注:25 pages, which includes three appendices

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v2 · 2026-10-28 01:53 · 最新观测版本

Approximate Envy-Freeness and Pareto Optimality Beyond Additivity

We study the compatibility of envy-freeness up to one good (EF1) and Pareto optimality (PO) beyond additive valuations. For two agents with monotone submodular valuations, we prove that a $2/3$-EF1+PO allocation always exists, while for every $α>3/4$, an $α$-EF1+PO allocation may fail to exist even for unweighted coverage valuations. A six-good EF1+PO counterexample resolves the longstanding exact existence question negatively. Exact EF1+PO does exist when one agent has a monotone submodular valuation and the remaining agents have identical additive valuations. For two agents, we also establish tight EF$k$+PO item thresholds of $4k+1$, $2k+1$, and $3k+1$ for two submodular agents, two subadditive agents, and one subadditive and one additive agent, respectively. Finally, deciding whether an EF$k$+PO allocation exists is NP-hard for every fixed integer $k\ge1$, even for three agents with unweighted coverage valuations, one of whom has an additive valuation.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗