跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2607.19059 · v2

On the completeness of transformation rules in reversible logic synthesis

首次提交 2026-07-21 20:48
版本更新 2026-10-28 16:27
雷达观测 2026-10-30 10:22
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Transformation rules play a central role in reversible circuit optimization, template-based rewriting, and equivalence checking, and establishing their completeness is a fundamental problem in reversible logic synthesis. In this work, we investigate the completeness of transformation rules for reversible circuits both with and without ancillary bits and garbage outputs. For reversible circuits without ancillary bits and garbage outputs, we introduce a refined and complete transformation rule set $\mathcal{RC}^{r}$, obtained by replacing one rule in the rule set $\mathcal{RC}$ proposed in the previous work (TCAD, 45, pp. 3711--3724, 2026) with a simpler and widely adopted transformation rule. Since all rules in $\mathcal{RC}^{r}$ are commonly used in reversible logic synthesis, this result reveals that practically adopted transformation rules are already sufficient to establish a complete rewriting framework. Based on this result, we further propose an extended rule set, denoted by $\mathcal{RC}^+$, and prove its completeness for reversible circuits with ancillary bits and garbage outputs. To the best of our knowledge, this work presents the first complete transformation rule set for arbitrary reversible circuits, regardless of whether ancillary bits or garbage outputs are employed. The proposed framework establishes a theoretical foundation for circuit optimization, template generation, and equivalence checking, and may facilitate the development of automated design tools for reversible and quantum circuits.

作者备注:1. In Lemma 2 and Proposition 5, the definitions of the path gates incorrectly include the target among the controls. 2. In Lemma 1, the definition of T_i^n contains q_{i-1} while allowing i=0. Thus T_0^n refers to the undefined bit q_{-1}. Its proof states that the last element of H_k is 10^{k-1}. But it is actually 0^{k-1}1. 3. References [27] and [28] contain bibliographic errors

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v2 · 2026-10-28 16:27 · 最新观测版本

On the completeness of transformation rules in reversible logic synthesis

Transformation rules play a central role in reversible circuit optimization, template-based rewriting, and equivalence checking, and establishing their completeness is a fundamental problem in reversible logic synthesis. In this work, we investigate the completeness of transformation rules for reversible circuits both with and without ancillary bits and garbage outputs. For reversible circuits without ancillary bits and garbage outputs, we introduce a refined and complete transformation rule set $\mathcal{RC}^{r}$, obtained by replacing one rule in the rule set $\mathcal{RC}$ proposed in the previous work (TCAD, 45, pp. 3711--3724, 2026) with a simpler and widely adopted transformation rule. Since all rules in $\mathcal{RC}^{r}$ are commonly used in reversible logic synthesis, this result reveals that practically adopted transformation rules are already sufficient to establish a complete rewriting framework. Based on this result, we further propose an extended rule set, denoted by $\mathcal{RC}^+$, and prove its completeness for reversible circuits with ancillary bits and garbage outputs. To the best of our knowledge, this work presents the first complete transformation rule set for arbitrary reversible circuits, regardless of whether ancillary bits or garbage outputs are employed. The proposed framework establishes a theoretical foundation for circuit optimization, template generation, and equivalence checking, and may facilitate the development of automated design tools for reversible and quantum circuits.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗