跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2607.20757 · v3

GaugeQuant: Online Learning of Quantization-Optimal Bases from LLM Symmetries

首次提交 2026-07-23 06:14
版本更新 2026-11-04 23:58
雷达观测 2026-11-05 12:13
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Transformers are known to have internal continuous symmetries that leave outputs invariant while altering how activations are distributed across coordinates, and hence how well they quantize. GaugeQuant leverages this in-training by introducing a LogSumExp term to the loss that breaks the symmetries, thus selecting a basis that minimizes activation outliers. A stop-gradient operator ensures that only rotation matrices are updated, yielding the language modeling objective completely unaltered. Our quantization strategy requires no specific calibration data, no quantization simulation, and adds a small inference overhead. As a proof of concept, we evaluate on WikiText-2 perplexity and zero-shot reasoning. On Qwen-2.5 0.5B, GaugeQuant reduces perplexity (e.g. $25.62 \to 16.76$ under W4A16) and improves zero-shot accuracy. On LLaMA-2 7B, perplexity improves but downstream accuracy does not. The code is available at: https://github.com/MPedraBento/gauge-quant.

作者备注:Accepted at the Symmetry and Geometry in Neural Representations Workshop (NeurReps), NeurIPS 2026

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v3 · 2026-11-04 23:58 · 最新观测版本

GaugeQuant: Online Learning of Quantization-Optimal Bases from LLM Symmetries

Transformers are known to have internal continuous symmetries that leave outputs invariant while altering how activations are distributed across coordinates, and hence how well they quantize. GaugeQuant leverages this in-training by introducing a LogSumExp term to the loss that breaks the symmetries, thus selecting a basis that minimizes activation outliers. A stop-gradient operator ensures that only rotation matrices are updated, yielding the language modeling objective completely unaltered. Our quantization strategy requires no specific calibration data, no quantization simulation, and adds a small inference overhead. As a proof of concept, we evaluate on WikiText-2 perplexity and zero-shot reasoning. On Qwen-2.5 0.5B, GaugeQuant reduces perplexity (e.g. $25.62 \to 16.76$ under W4A16) and improves zero-shot accuracy. On LLaMA-2 7B, perplexity improves but downstream accuracy does not. The code is available at: https://github.com/MPedraBento/gauge-quant.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗