← 研踪 PaperTrailarXiv:2607.27428 · v2
Rethinking AI in Medical Imaging: Assumptions, Reality, and Reframing; Towards Physician-Centered Agentic Reasoning
首次提交 2026-07-30 03:55
版本更新 2026-11-03 00:27
雷达观测 2026-11-04 23:41
摘要
Medical imaging has served as primary proving ground for clinical AI, yet a decade of intense research has not translated into proportionate bedside impact. We argue that this gap is not primarily a product of insufficient algorithmic performance, inadequate regulation, or limited explainability. Rather, it reflects a structural misalignment, between how AI systems are designed and evaluated, and how clinical decisions are made. This work identifies 8 interconnected dimensions of this misalignment: 1) the dominance of pixel-only models in a multimodal clinical world; 2) the erosion of physician trust through opaque and inflexible systems; 3) the unfulfilled promise of foundation models in data-sparse medical domains; 4) the persistent bottleneck of non-shareable under-curated datasets; 5) the gap between validated algorithms and deployable clinical platforms; 6) the slow, unmonitored translation of evidence into routine practice; 7) the risk of AI displacing rather than extending physician judgment; and 8) the failure of prediction-centric AI to generate actionable, agentic clinical guidance. For each dimension, we reframe the problem and propose a path forward, culminating in a vision of physician-centered AI solutions with agentic reasoning that extend, rather than replace, clinical judgment.
作者备注：13 pages, 3 figures. Accepted to Frontiers Biomed. Tech., 2026
观测到的版本
相邻记录可能跳过中间版本；首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。
v2 · 2026-11-03 00:27 · 最新观测版本
Rethinking AI in Medical Imaging: Assumptions, Reality, and Reframing; Towards Physician-Centered Agentic Reasoning
Medical imaging has served as primary proving ground for clinical AI, yet a decade of intense research has not translated into proportionate bedside impact. We argue that this gap is not primarily a product of insufficient algorithmic performance, inadequate regulation, or limited explainability. Rather, it reflects a structural misalignment, between how AI systems are designed and evaluated, and how clinical decisions are made. This work identifies 8 interconnected dimensions of this misalignment: 1) the dominance of pixel-only models in a multimodal clinical world; 2) the erosion of physician trust through opaque and inflexible systems; 3) the unfulfilled promise of foundation models in data-sparse medical domains; 4) the persistent bottleneck of non-shareable under-curated datasets; 5) the gap between validated algorithms and deployable clinical platforms; 6) the slow, unmonitored translation of evidence into routine practice; 7) the risk of AI displacing rather than extending physician judgment; and 8) the failure of prediction-centric AI to generate actionable, agentic clinical guidance. For each dimension, we reframe the problem and propose a path forward, culminating in a vision of physician-centered AI solutions with agentic reasoning that extend, rather than replace, clinical judgment.
查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗