跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2608.04222 · v2

TIDE: A Physically Diverse 3D Turbulence Benchmark Dataset for Advancing Scientific Machine Learning

首次提交 2026-08-05 04:56
版本更新 2026-11-11 05:37
雷达观测 2026-11-13 11:12
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Turbulence is a central testbed for machine learning on physical dynamics because its governing laws are known exactly. However, most existing studies remain in 2D, while 3D turbulence has fundamentally different physics and is far more costly to simulate. Existing 3D resources also typically provide only one realization per configuration, making it difficult to distinguish learning the dynamics from fitting the statistics of a single flow. In this paper, we introduce TIDE (Turbulent Incompressible DNS Ensembles), a 256^3 DNS corpus and benchmark for 3D incompressible turbulence, with 15 configurations on eight controlled axes, independent ensembles, pressure fields, and equation-level verification. The benchmark includes five tasks, standardized learned baselines, controlled generalization splits, and physical-fidelity metrics alongside pointwise error. Across the main forecasting configurations, current learned models trained under a fixed reference recipe barely outperform persistence and still make about twice the error of a spectral solver given the true equations. Moreover, lower pointwise error can coincide with severely distorted small-scale dynamics, showing that accuracy alone does not ensure physical fidelity. Rollout stability depends on the configuration, the training seed, and how densely training samples each trajectory. Joint training across neighboring regimes does not close the transfer gaps we test, and the forced-to-decay contrast bounds a conditioning limit: an estimate of the current forcing state removes 20-41% of the error a spectral solver makes without forcing input, while history or forcing inputs help only some learned architectures. Closing these accuracy, fidelity, and conditioning gaps is the central open problem made measurable by TIDE. https://github.com/Dyloong1/TIDE-dataset-benchmark

作者备注:20 pages, 13 figures, 28 tables. Dataset: https://huggingface.co/datasets/ydai17/TIDE ; Code: https://github.com/Dyloong1/TIDE-dataset-benchmark ; DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21589489

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v2 · 2026-11-11 05:37 · 最新观测版本

TIDE: A Physically Diverse 3D Turbulence Benchmark Dataset for Advancing Scientific Machine Learning

Turbulence is a central testbed for machine learning on physical dynamics because its governing laws are known exactly. However, most existing studies remain in 2D, while 3D turbulence has fundamentally different physics and is far more costly to simulate. Existing 3D resources also typically provide only one realization per configuration, making it difficult to distinguish learning the dynamics from fitting the statistics of a single flow. In this paper, we introduce TIDE (Turbulent Incompressible DNS Ensembles), a 256^3 DNS corpus and benchmark for 3D incompressible turbulence, with 15 configurations on eight controlled axes, independent ensembles, pressure fields, and equation-level verification. The benchmark includes five tasks, standardized learned baselines, controlled generalization splits, and physical-fidelity metrics alongside pointwise error. Across the main forecasting configurations, current learned models trained under a fixed reference recipe barely outperform persistence and still make about twice the error of a spectral solver given the true equations. Moreover, lower pointwise error can coincide with severely distorted small-scale dynamics, showing that accuracy alone does not ensure physical fidelity. Rollout stability depends on the configuration, the training seed, and how densely training samples each trajectory. Joint training across neighboring regimes does not close the transfer gaps we test, and the forced-to-decay contrast bounds a conditioning limit: an estimate of the current forcing state removes 20-41% of the error a spectral solver makes without forcing input, while history or forcing inputs help only some learned architectures. Closing these accuracy, fidelity, and conditioning gaps is the central open problem made measurable by TIDE. https://github.com/Dyloong1/TIDE-dataset-benchmark

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗