跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2608.06928 · v3

When Do Pretrained Audio Representations Help Music Recommendation? A Study Across Ranking and Generative Interfaces

首次提交 2026-08-07 16:03
版本更新 2026-10-27 21:14
雷达观测 2026-10-29 00:35
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Pretrained audio encoders are increasingly used to provide content representations for music recommendation, but their downstream value can change substantially with the recommendation interface through which they are used. We study this effect across six pretrained audio encoders and three representative settings: content-based retrieval, sequential recommendation, and Semantic-ID-based generative recommendation. Using matched random-feature and ID-only controls, we distinguish absolute recommendation performance from gains over content-free inputs. Across two music datasets and a full-catalog evaluation, music-pretrained and audio-text-aligned encoders are generally stronger when their pretrained geometry is used directly or converted into Semantic IDs, while these differences become much smaller after interaction-based adaptation in SASRec. We further examine how audio representations should be discretized for generative recommendation by varying residual-quantization width, depth, and retained layers. At epoch 10, depth one performs best at every tested width, while larger codebooks generally help at depth three; the best single-layer subset also outperforms the full three-layer identifier in every evaluated comparison. For CLAP-Music, the third-layer identifier ranks higher under both original and shuffled assignments, whereas the full three-layer identifier gains more from the original assignment. Better reconstruction likewise does not ensure better ranking. Overall, our results show that the utility of pretrained audio representations is interface-dependent and that Semantic-ID quality should be assessed by downstream ranking rather than representation fidelity alone.

作者备注:12 pages, 5 figures, 10 tables. Updated title and evaluation protocol; expanded experiments with random-feature, ID-only, and shuffled-SID controls

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v3 · 2026-10-27 21:14 · 最新观测版本

When Do Pretrained Audio Representations Help Music Recommendation? A Study Across Ranking and Generative Interfaces

Pretrained audio encoders are increasingly used to provide content representations for music recommendation, but their downstream value can change substantially with the recommendation interface through which they are used. We study this effect across six pretrained audio encoders and three representative settings: content-based retrieval, sequential recommendation, and Semantic-ID-based generative recommendation. Using matched random-feature and ID-only controls, we distinguish absolute recommendation performance from gains over content-free inputs. Across two music datasets and a full-catalog evaluation, music-pretrained and audio-text-aligned encoders are generally stronger when their pretrained geometry is used directly or converted into Semantic IDs, while these differences become much smaller after interaction-based adaptation in SASRec. We further examine how audio representations should be discretized for generative recommendation by varying residual-quantization width, depth, and retained layers. At epoch 10, depth one performs best at every tested width, while larger codebooks generally help at depth three; the best single-layer subset also outperforms the full three-layer identifier in every evaluated comparison. For CLAP-Music, the third-layer identifier ranks higher under both original and shuffled assignments, whereas the full three-layer identifier gains more from the original assignment. Better reconstruction likewise does not ensure better ranking. Overall, our results show that the utility of pretrained audio representations is interface-dependent and that Semantic-ID quality should be assessed by downstream ranking rather than representation fidelity alone.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗