跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2608.12231 · v3

An Efficient Minimax-Optimal Algorithm for Adversarial $m$-Set Bandits

首次提交 2026-08-13 00:28
版本更新 2026-11-03 18:20
雷达观测 2026-11-04 23:39
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

We study adversarial combinatorial bandits with $m$-set actions, where at each round the learner selects $m$ out of $d$ items and observes only the aggregate loss of the selected items. The resulting action set contains $K=\binom{d}{m}$ elements and can therefore be exponentially large. We propose a computationally efficient algorithm that exploits this structure without explicitly enumerating the action set. Against adaptive non-anticipating adversaries, it guarantees, with probability at least $1-δ$, regret against the best action in hindsight of $R_T =O(\sqrt{dT\log(K/δ)}). $ This matches the high-probability regret bound of the finite-action EXP3 with Kiefer-Wolfowitz exploration algorithm of Zimmert and Lattimore, whose direct implementation may require exponential space. Our algorithm instead represents each sampling distribution with $d$ parameters and runs in polynomial time without enumerating the action set. This resolves an open problem posed by Maiti et al. We complement this upper bound with a matching high-probability lower bound. For all sufficiently small $δ$ and all sufficiently large horizons, every randomized algorithm admits an adaptive non-anticipating adversary for which, with probability at least $δ$, $R_T=Ω( \sqrt{dT\log(K/δ)}). $ Thus, the rate is minimax optimal up to universal constants in this regime. In particular, setting $m=1$ shows that the $\log K$ factor in the high-probability regret bound for ordinary $K$-armed bandits against adaptive non-anticipating adversaries is unavoidable. This strengthens the lower bound of Gerchinovitz and Lattimore, closing the remaining $\sqrt{\log K}$ gap between high-probability upper and lower regret bounds.

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v3 · 2026-11-03 18:20 · 最新观测版本

An Efficient Minimax-Optimal Algorithm for Adversarial $m$-Set Bandits

We study adversarial combinatorial bandits with $m$-set actions, where at each round the learner selects $m$ out of $d$ items and observes only the aggregate loss of the selected items. The resulting action set contains $K=\binom{d}{m}$ elements and can therefore be exponentially large. We propose a computationally efficient algorithm that exploits this structure without explicitly enumerating the action set. Against adaptive non-anticipating adversaries, it guarantees, with probability at least $1-δ$, regret against the best action in hindsight of $R_T =O(\sqrt{dT\log(K/δ)}). $ This matches the high-probability regret bound of the finite-action EXP3 with Kiefer-Wolfowitz exploration algorithm of Zimmert and Lattimore, whose direct implementation may require exponential space. Our algorithm instead represents each sampling distribution with $d$ parameters and runs in polynomial time without enumerating the action set. This resolves an open problem posed by Maiti et al. We complement this upper bound with a matching high-probability lower bound. For all sufficiently small $δ$ and all sufficiently large horizons, every randomized algorithm admits an adaptive non-anticipating adversary for which, with probability at least $δ$, $R_T=Ω( \sqrt{dT\log(K/δ)}). $ Thus, the rate is minimax optimal up to universal constants in this regime. In particular, setting $m=1$ shows that the $\log K$ factor in the high-probability regret bound for ordinary $K$-armed bandits against adaptive non-anticipating adversaries is unavoidable. This strengthens the lower bound of Gerchinovitz and Lattimore, closing the remaining $\sqrt{\log K}$ gap between high-probability upper and lower regret bounds.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗