跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2608.16140 · v3

Internal Reasoning and Consistency in Reflective Grounded Arithmetic

首次提交 2026-08-17 13:48
版本更新 2026-11-11 16:15
雷达观测 2026-11-13 11:11
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Reflective Grounded Arithmetic (RGA) is a paracomplete arithmetic allowing direct expression of any general-recursive computation. Every RGA term is a program and truth is grounded evaluation, with a proof certificate at each universal quantifier. This paper shows, in a machine-checked Isabelle/HOL development, that such a system is powerful enough to carry out its own metamathematics. A fuel-indexed decider of RGA's grounded semantics and checkers for RGA's proofs are compiled primitive-recursive RGA terms. RGA proves internally that its decider never affirms 0 = 1, and that every well-formed term it affirms has an RGA proof accepted by a transparent test. RGA proves that, for each valid RGA proof, its conclusion is true. RGA proves that each grounded-true well-formed term is provable. RGA proves that no proof in either of two decided classes of RGA proofs derives 0 = 1. RGA's truth predicate also serves as a medium for proof by reflection, of the kind that adds nothing to the system. RGA derives disquotation for quantifier-free formulas as rules in every context, at a free variable, and proves, as one sentence, that whenever its normalizer for polynomials in one variable gives two terms the same normal form, the equation between them is true at every value of the variable. Each such polynomial identity then follows from that sentence by closed evaluation and disquotation, with no reflection rule. A companion paper proves Gödel's incompleteness theorems for RGA and its extensions.

作者备注:substantially revised; Goedel incompleteness theorems split into separate preprint 2611.13697; now 163 pages

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v3 · 2026-11-11 16:15 · 最新观测版本

Internal Reasoning and Consistency in Reflective Grounded Arithmetic

Reflective Grounded Arithmetic (RGA) is a paracomplete arithmetic allowing direct expression of any general-recursive computation. Every RGA term is a program and truth is grounded evaluation, with a proof certificate at each universal quantifier. This paper shows, in a machine-checked Isabelle/HOL development, that such a system is powerful enough to carry out its own metamathematics. A fuel-indexed decider of RGA's grounded semantics and checkers for RGA's proofs are compiled primitive-recursive RGA terms. RGA proves internally that its decider never affirms 0 = 1, and that every well-formed term it affirms has an RGA proof accepted by a transparent test. RGA proves that, for each valid RGA proof, its conclusion is true. RGA proves that each grounded-true well-formed term is provable. RGA proves that no proof in either of two decided classes of RGA proofs derives 0 = 1. RGA's truth predicate also serves as a medium for proof by reflection, of the kind that adds nothing to the system. RGA derives disquotation for quantifier-free formulas as rules in every context, at a free variable, and proves, as one sentence, that whenever its normalizer for polynomials in one variable gives two terms the same normal form, the equation between them is true at every value of the variable. Each such polynomial identity then follows from that sentence by closed evaluation and disquotation, with no reflection rule. A companion paper proves Gödel's incompleteness theorems for RGA and its extensions.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗