跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2608.17162 · v2

OraclePhys: A Systematic Framework for LLM Fine-Tuning on Structural Mechanics

首次提交 2026-08-18 05:56
版本更新 2026-11-08 13:42
雷达观测 2026-11-10 12:16
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

What fine-tuning teaches a model is usually diagnosed after the fact. We make it an experimental variable. OraclePhys has three parts. OraclePhys-Bench is a structural-mechanics benchmark whose finite-element oracle grades every answer and counterfactual edit. OraclePhys-30K holds seven answer forms over byte-identical structure descriptions. A controlled training study compares the forms and verifier roles. Two findings follow. First, within this task family the answer form of the label determines what fine-tuning teaches. Ranking supervision lifts held-out localization of the most-deforming story on taller structures from 0.25 to 0.86, a peak-value label yields at best a partial predictor, and a pass/fail label none. This ranking-versus-peak gap replicates on a second domain, a second model family and a paraphrased surface. Second, the gap between our standard SFT and GRPO runs is mostly a recipe effect. With learning rate and step budget matched, the two reach held-out accuracies within 0.03 of each other. At higher rates, GRPO falls below its start while SFT does not. Both also teach the model to apply edits given as instructions. The trained 8B matches a specialist and exceeds a frontier LLM. Both domains are linear, steady-state systems with synthetic text inputs.

作者备注:21 pages, 7 figures, 14 tables. v2: revised text and additional experiments (matched-recipe SFT vs. GRPO comparison). Under review at ACL Rolling Review

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v2 · 2026-11-08 13:42 · 最新观测版本

OraclePhys: A Systematic Framework for LLM Fine-Tuning on Structural Mechanics

What fine-tuning teaches a model is usually diagnosed after the fact. We make it an experimental variable. OraclePhys has three parts. OraclePhys-Bench is a structural-mechanics benchmark whose finite-element oracle grades every answer and counterfactual edit. OraclePhys-30K holds seven answer forms over byte-identical structure descriptions. A controlled training study compares the forms and verifier roles. Two findings follow. First, within this task family the answer form of the label determines what fine-tuning teaches. Ranking supervision lifts held-out localization of the most-deforming story on taller structures from 0.25 to 0.86, a peak-value label yields at best a partial predictor, and a pass/fail label none. This ranking-versus-peak gap replicates on a second domain, a second model family and a paraphrased surface. Second, the gap between our standard SFT and GRPO runs is mostly a recipe effect. With learning rate and step budget matched, the two reach held-out accuracies within 0.03 of each other. At higher rates, GRPO falls below its start while SFT does not. Both also teach the model to apply edits given as instructions. The trained 8B matches a specialist and exceeds a frontier LLM. Both domains are linear, steady-state systems with synthetic text inputs.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗