跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2608.28542 · v2

Policy-Controlled Offline-Verifiable Accountability for Cross-Organization Agent Messaging: A Preserved Evidence-Bundle Approach

首次提交 2026-08-29 01:18
版本更新 2026-11-10 06:19
雷达观测 2026-11-11 11:04
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Cross-organization agent workflows require preserved evidence that remains independently verifiable during later audit or dispute review. Such workflows may involve multiple organizations, delegated actions, policy-relevant events, and disputed accountability claims. This is difficult when live systems are unavailable, controlled by one party, or not trusted by all participants. Existing mechanisms provide useful pieces, including authenticated logging, delegation semantics, signed checkpoints, and consistency checks. What remains missing is a verifier-centered event-level bundle for checking evidence sufficiency offline under an explicit policy. We propose a preserved evidence-bundle model and a policy-controlled offline verifier for agent-to-agent workflow events. Each bundle preserves policy-required evidence, including sender authentication, authenticated log commitment, witness-backed checkpoint evidence, append-only continuity, delegation-aware authorization evidence, and, when issued and required by policy, explicit receiver-signed receipt evidence. The verifier accepts a bundle only when all mandatory and policy-required checks succeed, giving a later dispute reviewer an offline basis for assessing evidence sufficiency. It does not infer delivery or receipt from transport behavior or log inclusion alone. In a prototype evaluation, the event-type study used 300 synthetic four-event healthcare workflow cases and 1200 valid preserved bundles. The policy-profile comparison observed its largest median latency reduction relative to the fully enabled profile when checkpoint-context validation was disabled. All 17 tested cases in the original negative-evidence diagnostic suite were rejected under the fully enabled profile. Additional functional studies examined context and signed-reference binding. These results support prototype feasibility for the evaluated workloads.

作者备注:v2: Revised title and abstract, clarified policy-controlled verification, and expanded the evaluation. 23 pages, 5 figures, 16 tables

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

本站首次收录为 v2,暂无更早版本可对照。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v2 · 2026-11-10 06:19 · 最新观测版本

Policy-Controlled Offline-Verifiable Accountability for Cross-Organization Agent Messaging: A Preserved Evidence-Bundle Approach

Cross-organization agent workflows require preserved evidence that remains independently verifiable during later audit or dispute review. Such workflows may involve multiple organizations, delegated actions, policy-relevant events, and disputed accountability claims. This is difficult when live systems are unavailable, controlled by one party, or not trusted by all participants. Existing mechanisms provide useful pieces, including authenticated logging, delegation semantics, signed checkpoints, and consistency checks. What remains missing is a verifier-centered event-level bundle for checking evidence sufficiency offline under an explicit policy. We propose a preserved evidence-bundle model and a policy-controlled offline verifier for agent-to-agent workflow events. Each bundle preserves policy-required evidence, including sender authentication, authenticated log commitment, witness-backed checkpoint evidence, append-only continuity, delegation-aware authorization evidence, and, when issued and required by policy, explicit receiver-signed receipt evidence. The verifier accepts a bundle only when all mandatory and policy-required checks succeed, giving a later dispute reviewer an offline basis for assessing evidence sufficiency. It does not infer delivery or receipt from transport behavior or log inclusion alone. In a prototype evaluation, the event-type study used 300 synthetic four-event healthcare workflow cases and 1200 valid preserved bundles. The policy-profile comparison observed its largest median latency reduction relative to the fully enabled profile when checkpoint-context validation was disabled. All 17 tested cases in the original negative-evidence diagnostic suite were rejected under the fully enabled profile. Additional functional studies examined context and signed-reference binding. These results support prototype feasibility for the evaluated workloads.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗