跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2609.08869 · v2

OntoKG-EQ: Evidence-boundary auditing for analytical knowledge graphs

首次提交 2026-09-08 23:11
版本更新 2026-11-01 22:58
雷达观测 2026-11-04 23:43
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

An analytical knowledge-graph result can be supported in its ambient graph while its delivered explanation omits deciding observations. OntoKG-EQ connects competency-question requirements to an executable audit of ambient observations, declared finding support and delivered evidence. A bounded declarative interpreter distinguishes positive, false and unknown numerical status, with same-witness unit readiness reported separately. A public-data application reconstructs England's August 2026 provider-level referral-to-treatment statistical screen. Independent source recomputation reconciles 532 providers with the publisher workbook: 91 meet the inclusive 92% threshold and 441 do not. One additional roster entry remains unavailable rather than zero-filled. All 533 application frames agree with an independently implemented standards-based validation and availability baseline. Transfer requires a disclosed source adapter and arithmetic compilation, but no change to the core interpreter. Twenty-six constructed analytical cases yield 78 status/readiness agreements. Actual financial release replay reproduces two omitted-volume defects: support and delivery suffice for 19 of 21 original findings and all 21 repaired findings after interface adaptation. A separate replay agrees on 487 overlapping financial records. Source audits expose scaling errors and unresolved comparator and temporal assumptions, so financial examples do not establish authenticated market effects. The contribution is a reproducible analytical audit interface and source-reconciled application, not new sufficiency logic or first evidence-boundary isolation. Historical ratings measure preference only; objective human audit benefits and independent production deployment remain untested.

作者备注:v2: substantially revised and retitled; adds an executable evidence-boundary audit, an NHS public-data application and a release-robustness extension. 30 pages, 2 figures; supplementary material included as an appendix. Code and data: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23860671

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v2 · 2026-11-01 22:58 · 最新观测版本

OntoKG-EQ: Evidence-boundary auditing for analytical knowledge graphs

An analytical knowledge-graph result can be supported in its ambient graph while its delivered explanation omits deciding observations. OntoKG-EQ connects competency-question requirements to an executable audit of ambient observations, declared finding support and delivered evidence. A bounded declarative interpreter distinguishes positive, false and unknown numerical status, with same-witness unit readiness reported separately. A public-data application reconstructs England's August 2026 provider-level referral-to-treatment statistical screen. Independent source recomputation reconciles 532 providers with the publisher workbook: 91 meet the inclusive 92% threshold and 441 do not. One additional roster entry remains unavailable rather than zero-filled. All 533 application frames agree with an independently implemented standards-based validation and availability baseline. Transfer requires a disclosed source adapter and arithmetic compilation, but no change to the core interpreter. Twenty-six constructed analytical cases yield 78 status/readiness agreements. Actual financial release replay reproduces two omitted-volume defects: support and delivery suffice for 19 of 21 original findings and all 21 repaired findings after interface adaptation. A separate replay agrees on 487 overlapping financial records. Source audits expose scaling errors and unresolved comparator and temporal assumptions, so financial examples do not establish authenticated market effects. The contribution is a reproducible analytical audit interface and source-reconciled application, not new sufficiency logic or first evidence-boundary isolation. Historical ratings measure preference only; objective human audit benefits and independent production deployment remain untested.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗