跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2609.15465 · v3

Building a Dataset for Music Sample Identification

首次提交 2026-09-14 20:27
版本更新 2026-10-26 23:54
雷达观测 2026-10-29 00:35
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Sample identification (SI) is the task of matching an element of a musical work to its musically transformed versions used to create new works. The task has received little attention and lacks large-scale publicly available data. In this work, we mine sampling annotations from a music database and split them for training and evaluation. The resulting dataset is nearly three orders of magnitude larger than the existing SI benchmarks, with training, validation, and test sets of 114 k, 6 k, and 10 k tracks. We find that naively splitting the annotations places the same tracks in different sets. To avoid this, we construct a graph from the annotations and split it over connected components. We further find that a single mega-component contains half of the annotations, making component-wise splitting incompatible with balanced splits; we trim it, yielding a leakage-aware pipeline. We share the dataset for non-commercial scientific research purposes only and make the data-analysis and splitting code publicly available. We hope that our work fosters research on SI.

作者备注:Extended Abstracts for the Late-Breaking Demo Session of the 27th Int. Society for Music Information Retrieval Conf., 2026

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v3 · 2026-10-26 23:54 · 最新观测版本

Building a Dataset for Music Sample Identification

Sample identification (SI) is the task of matching an element of a musical work to its musically transformed versions used to create new works. The task has received little attention and lacks large-scale publicly available data. In this work, we mine sampling annotations from a music database and split them for training and evaluation. The resulting dataset is nearly three orders of magnitude larger than the existing SI benchmarks, with training, validation, and test sets of 114 k, 6 k, and 10 k tracks. We find that naively splitting the annotations places the same tracks in different sets. To avoid this, we construct a graph from the annotations and split it over connected components. We further find that a single mega-component contains half of the annotations, making component-wise splitting incompatible with balanced splits; we trim it, yielding a leakage-aware pipeline. We share the dataset for non-commercial scientific research purposes only and make the data-analysis and splitting code publicly available. We hope that our work fosters research on SI.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗