跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2609.15825 · v3

Sharp Regret Bounds and a Task-Covariance Correction for Spectral Representation Learning

首次提交 2026-09-15 00:26
版本更新 2026-11-09 20:49
雷达观测 2026-11-10 15:22
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Spectral contrastive learning keeps the kk directions along which two views of the data depend most strongly, while downstream tasks may need other directions. Existing guarantees for spectral features assume that the distribution of tasks has no preferred direction. We show that this isotropy condition is the wrong criterion. With linear probing, the task distribution affects the average probing gain only through the matrix BΛB⊤BΛB^\top, where BB records the dependence between views and ΛΛ is the task covariance: optimal features span its top-kk eigenspace, whereas spectral features span that of BB⊤BB^\top. Transfer therefore depends on alignment, and strongly uneven task preferences cost nothing when they favour the spectral directions. Otherwise the regret of spectral features is at most linear in the anisotropy of ΛΛ. No representation chosen without task information improves this rate when the leading spectrum is flat, and a spectral gap makes it quadratic. With labelled tasks, the same matrix gives a correction: Fisher discriminant directions for a frozen encoder, or a one-term change to the spectral contrastive loss. We bound the regret of the correction by the error in estimating BΛB⊤BΛB^\top, and compare this error with the misalignment of spectral features to decide when to correct. The analysis extends to finite samples, continuous variables and noisy views. Correction reduces synthetic held-out regret from 0.8580.858 to 0.0030.003 with 20002000 labelled tasks, and the decision rule gives the lowest regret among the tested rules at every bank size. On CIFAR-100, spectral features of frozen encoders keep most of the task signal on unseen classes, and where a bank of other classes would lower accuracy, the rule keeps them in every case.

作者备注:45 pages, 4 figures, 15 tables. Feedback and comments are welcome!

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

本站首次收录为 v3,暂无更早版本可对照。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v3 · 2026-11-09 20:49 · 最新观测版本

Sharp Regret Bounds and a Task-Covariance Correction for Spectral Representation Learning

Spectral contrastive learning keeps the kk directions along which two views of the data depend most strongly, while downstream tasks may need other directions. Existing guarantees for spectral features assume that the distribution of tasks has no preferred direction. We show that this isotropy condition is the wrong criterion. With linear probing, the task distribution affects the average probing gain only through the matrix BΛB⊤BΛB^\top, where BB records the dependence between views and ΛΛ is the task covariance: optimal features span its top-kk eigenspace, whereas spectral features span that of BB⊤BB^\top. Transfer therefore depends on alignment, and strongly uneven task preferences cost nothing when they favour the spectral directions. Otherwise the regret of spectral features is at most linear in the anisotropy of ΛΛ. No representation chosen without task information improves this rate when the leading spectrum is flat, and a spectral gap makes it quadratic. With labelled tasks, the same matrix gives a correction: Fisher discriminant directions for a frozen encoder, or a one-term change to the spectral contrastive loss. We bound the regret of the correction by the error in estimating BΛB⊤BΛB^\top, and compare this error with the misalignment of spectral features to decide when to correct. The analysis extends to finite samples, continuous variables and noisy views. Correction reduces synthetic held-out regret from 0.8580.858 to 0.0030.003 with 20002000 labelled tasks, and the decision rule gives the lowest regret among the tested rules at every bank size. On CIFAR-100, spectral features of frozen encoders keep most of the task signal on unseen classes, and where a bank of other classes would lower accuracy, the rule keeps them in every case.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗