跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2609.29332 · v2

Diverse Representation in Approval-Based Committee Voting

首次提交 2026-09-24 18:07
版本更新 2026-10-29 05:31
雷达观测 2026-10-30 11:25
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

The study of approval-based committee voting has so far focused predominantly on proportional representation. The canonical notion of diverse representation, based on the Chamberlin-Courant score, counts the number of voters with at least one representative in the committee, making it an individualistic notion. We develop a more comprehensive theory that instead requires the representation of many groups of voters, grounding it in the justified representation (JR) axiom, which we strengthen in two directions. First, we study the existing axioms of Strong JR (SJR) and Semi-Strong JR (SSJR), which consider the same cohesive groups as JR but demand stricter representation. We show that neither can be optimized efficiently on general domains (unless P = NP), but both can be on the Candidate Interval and Voter Interval domain. Second, to capture the unique and defining opinions of a group, we introduce Distinctive Representation (DR) and its local optimization variant, Local DR. We address satisfiability and computation time, and show (Local) DR to be distinct from known proportionality and diversity axioms. Experiments on real-world and synthetic data show that Local DR performs well on multiple empirical measures of diversity.

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v2 · 2026-10-29 05:31 · 最新观测版本

Diverse Representation in Approval-Based Committee Voting

The study of approval-based committee voting has so far focused predominantly on proportional representation. The canonical notion of diverse representation, based on the Chamberlin-Courant score, counts the number of voters with at least one representative in the committee, making it an individualistic notion. We develop a more comprehensive theory that instead requires the representation of many groups of voters, grounding it in the justified representation (JR) axiom, which we strengthen in two directions. First, we study the existing axioms of Strong JR (SJR) and Semi-Strong JR (SSJR), which consider the same cohesive groups as JR but demand stricter representation. We show that neither can be optimized efficiently on general domains (unless P = NP), but both can be on the Candidate Interval and Voter Interval domain. Second, to capture the unique and defining opinions of a group, we introduce Distinctive Representation (DR) and its local optimization variant, Local DR. We address satisfiability and computation time, and show (Local) DR to be distinct from known proportionality and diversity axioms. Experiments on real-world and synthetic data show that Local DR performs well on multiple empirical measures of diversity.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗