跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2609.30838 · v2

Peer-Grounded Counterfactual Path Planning for Chronic Health Management

首次提交 2026-09-25 13:33
版本更新 2026-11-05 15:00
雷达观测 2026-11-06 12:09
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Effective behavioral intervention in chronic disease management requires a sequence of incremental steps, each grounded in what similar individuals have achieved. Multimodal records of daily behavior make such evidence available outside the clinic. Counterfactual explanation, an explainable AI approach, can turn these records into guidance, yet endpoint-only methods return a target state without a route to it. We propose POROS (Peer-Grounded Optimal Routes Over States), a domain-agnostic framework rooted in Bandura's self-efficacy theory and Festinger's social comparison theory. POROS constructs a Behavioral Progression Graph, a directed acyclic graph over observed patient states in which every edge requires both peer-grounded behavioral proximity and strict improvement in the observed health outcome. Every edge is bounded by a feasibility threshold derived from the cohort's day-to-day behavioral changes. Minimum-cost paths through this graph decompose behavioral gaps into incremental, peer-grounded steps. We evaluate POROS on two independent longitudinal cohorts of patients with type 1 diabetes, with a per-patient predictor estimating individual time in range (TIR, blood glucose within 70-180 mg/dL) along each path. Compared with an endpoint-only baseline, POROS returns multi-hop paths to the same target for 14.4% and 19.8% of days below the 70% TIR threshold, reducing the per-step change in carbohydrate intake, insulin dose, and bolus timing by 38-42% on the larger cohort. POROS also supports improvement within the same outcome class, connecting 78.1% and 83.7% of outcome-ordered pairs of well-controlled days. Together, these findings demonstrate how POROS translates multimodal health records into incremental, peer-grounded guidance for chronic disease management through observational path planning.

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v2 · 2026-11-05 15:00 · 最新观测版本

Peer-Grounded Counterfactual Path Planning for Chronic Health Management

Effective behavioral intervention in chronic disease management requires a sequence of incremental steps, each grounded in what similar individuals have achieved. Multimodal records of daily behavior make such evidence available outside the clinic. Counterfactual explanation, an explainable AI approach, can turn these records into guidance, yet endpoint-only methods return a target state without a route to it. We propose POROS (Peer-Grounded Optimal Routes Over States), a domain-agnostic framework rooted in Bandura's self-efficacy theory and Festinger's social comparison theory. POROS constructs a Behavioral Progression Graph, a directed acyclic graph over observed patient states in which every edge requires both peer-grounded behavioral proximity and strict improvement in the observed health outcome. Every edge is bounded by a feasibility threshold derived from the cohort's day-to-day behavioral changes. Minimum-cost paths through this graph decompose behavioral gaps into incremental, peer-grounded steps. We evaluate POROS on two independent longitudinal cohorts of patients with type 1 diabetes, with a per-patient predictor estimating individual time in range (TIR, blood glucose within 70-180 mg/dL) along each path. Compared with an endpoint-only baseline, POROS returns multi-hop paths to the same target for 14.4% and 19.8% of days below the 70% TIR threshold, reducing the per-step change in carbohydrate intake, insulin dose, and bolus timing by 38-42% on the larger cohort. POROS also supports improvement within the same outcome class, connecting 78.1% and 83.7% of outcome-ordered pairs of well-controlled days. Together, these findings demonstrate how POROS translates multimodal health records into incremental, peer-grounded guidance for chronic disease management through observational path planning.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗