跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2609.32007 · v2

Interactive Proofs of Proximity for Model Evaluation

首次提交 2026-09-26 05:10
版本更新 2026-11-13 00:33
雷达观测 2026-11-13 14:15
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

We study interactive proofs of proximity (IPPs) for model evaluation, where a resource-limited verifier interacts with an untrusted prover, typically the model owner, to certify statistical properties of a model under an unknown input distribution. Our formulation separates sampling the input distribution from querying the model and evaluating its output; distinguishes real audit data (black-box sampling) from generated data (chosen-randomness, or gray-box, access to the sampler); and allows the prover and verifier to use different evaluators. We focus on doubly-sublinear IPPs, where both the verifier and honest prover use sublinear resources, and on (weighted) Hamming weight properties. For ordinary Hamming weight, we give a tolerant doubly-sublinear IPP. For completeness and soundness radii εc<εf\varepsilon_c<\varepsilon_f and gap g=εf−εcg=\varepsilon_f-\varepsilon_c, a logarithmic-round instantiation uses O~(1/g)\widetilde{O}(1/g) verifier queries and O(1/g2)O(1/g^2) honest-prover queries, improving the cubic dependence of Amir, Goldreich, and Rothblum (ITCS 2025). We prove matching query lower bounds up to polylogarithmic factors. For distribution-weighted Hamming weight, black-box sampling requires Θ(1/g2)Θ(1/g^2) verifier samples but only O~(1/g)\widetilde{O}(1/g) evaluations; the quadratic sample complexity is necessary in the interior regime. With chosen-randomness access, the problem reduces to ordinary Hamming weight, yielding O~(1/g)\widetilde{O}(1/g) calls and evaluations. If the parties' evaluators disagree arbitrarily on a ρρ-fraction of the distribution and by at most γγ elsewhere, our protocols remain doubly sublinear whenever g>2κg>2κ, where κ=ρ+(1−ρ)γκ=ρ+(1-ρ)γ. Applications include auditing accuracy, group fairness, calibration, harmlessness, usefulness, and average-case robustness.

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

本站首次收录为 v2,暂无更早版本可对照。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v2 · 2026-11-13 00:33 · 最新观测版本

Interactive Proofs of Proximity for Model Evaluation

We study interactive proofs of proximity (IPPs) for model evaluation, where a resource-limited verifier interacts with an untrusted prover, typically the model owner, to certify statistical properties of a model under an unknown input distribution. Our formulation separates sampling the input distribution from querying the model and evaluating its output; distinguishes real audit data (black-box sampling) from generated data (chosen-randomness, or gray-box, access to the sampler); and allows the prover and verifier to use different evaluators. We focus on doubly-sublinear IPPs, where both the verifier and honest prover use sublinear resources, and on (weighted) Hamming weight properties. For ordinary Hamming weight, we give a tolerant doubly-sublinear IPP. For completeness and soundness radii εc<εf\varepsilon_c<\varepsilon_f and gap g=εf−εcg=\varepsilon_f-\varepsilon_c, a logarithmic-round instantiation uses O~(1/g)\widetilde{O}(1/g) verifier queries and O(1/g2)O(1/g^2) honest-prover queries, improving the cubic dependence of Amir, Goldreich, and Rothblum (ITCS 2025). We prove matching query lower bounds up to polylogarithmic factors. For distribution-weighted Hamming weight, black-box sampling requires Θ(1/g2)Θ(1/g^2) verifier samples but only O~(1/g)\widetilde{O}(1/g) evaluations; the quadratic sample complexity is necessary in the interior regime. With chosen-randomness access, the problem reduces to ordinary Hamming weight, yielding O~(1/g)\widetilde{O}(1/g) calls and evaluations. If the parties' evaluators disagree arbitrarily on a ρρ-fraction of the distribution and by at most γγ elsewhere, our protocols remain doubly sublinear whenever g>2κg>2κ, where κ=ρ+(1−ρ)γκ=ρ+(1-ρ)γ. Applications include auditing accuracy, group fairness, calibration, harmlessness, usefulness, and average-case robustness.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗