跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2609.34639 · v2

Uniform Race: Parameter-Free Approximate Rejection Sampling

首次提交 2026-09-28 16:53
版本更新 2026-11-04 13:10
雷达观测 2026-11-05 11:10
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Consider the approximate sampling problem: given $N$ independent samples from a proposal distribution $μ$, the goal is to select one whose distribution is close to a target $π$ specified only up to a normalizing constant. The seminal work of Block & Polyanskiy (2023) provides a total variation (TV) error bound for approximate rejection sampling (RS) as a function of the algorithm's acceptance threshold $M$. The ideal threshold $M$ that minimizes the bound, however, depends on properties of $(π, μ)$ that are typically unavailable from the observed sample. This raises a natural question: Can one attain the best RS guarantee without taking the best $M$ as input? We answer this question affirmatively by proposing a parameter-free sampling algorithm called uniform race (UR). UR computes a score for each sample $y$ that is the importance weight $π(y)/μ(y)$ divided by an independent uniform random variable and then returns the one with the highest score. We prove that UR attains the best $M$-tuned TV error bound for RS. That is, UR, without knowing the best $M$, achieves the same performance guarantee as RS that takes the best $M$ as input. We also prove that UR has no larger TV error than the budget-calibrated version of the rejection sampler of Rohatgi et al. (2025) and sampling importance resampling (SIR). In particular, we identify instances where UR's error is exponentially smaller in $N$ than that of these two baselines. Furthermore, we establish conditions under which attaining this RS guarantee for every $(π, μ)$ uniquely determines the selection probabilities as those of UR. Finally, test-time scaling experiments on LLM reasoning tasks corroborate the theoretical comparisons and demonstrate that UR remains competitive without requiring threshold selection.

作者备注:51 pages, 5 figures

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v2 · 2026-11-04 13:10 · 最新观测版本

Uniform Race: Parameter-Free Approximate Rejection Sampling

Consider the approximate sampling problem: given $N$ independent samples from a proposal distribution $μ$, the goal is to select one whose distribution is close to a target $π$ specified only up to a normalizing constant. The seminal work of Block & Polyanskiy (2023) provides a total variation (TV) error bound for approximate rejection sampling (RS) as a function of the algorithm's acceptance threshold $M$. The ideal threshold $M$ that minimizes the bound, however, depends on properties of $(π, μ)$ that are typically unavailable from the observed sample. This raises a natural question: Can one attain the best RS guarantee without taking the best $M$ as input? We answer this question affirmatively by proposing a parameter-free sampling algorithm called uniform race (UR). UR computes a score for each sample $y$ that is the importance weight $π(y)/μ(y)$ divided by an independent uniform random variable and then returns the one with the highest score. We prove that UR attains the best $M$-tuned TV error bound for RS. That is, UR, without knowing the best $M$, achieves the same performance guarantee as RS that takes the best $M$ as input. We also prove that UR has no larger TV error than the budget-calibrated version of the rejection sampler of Rohatgi et al. (2025) and sampling importance resampling (SIR). In particular, we identify instances where UR's error is exponentially smaller in $N$ than that of these two baselines. Furthermore, we establish conditions under which attaining this RS guarantee for every $(π, μ)$ uniquely determines the selection probabilities as those of UR. Finally, test-time scaling experiments on LLM reasoning tasks corroborate the theoretical comparisons and demonstrate that UR remains competitive without requiring threshold selection.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗