跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2609.39774 · v3

Anchoring the Security of Invariant Quantum Money

首次提交 2026-09-30 22:01
版本更新 2026-11-03 18:48
雷达观测 2026-11-04 23:39
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Prior studies on quantum money from knots, and the invariant money framework that generalizes it, anchor their security on the hardness of path-finding. However, we show that the hardness of path-finding is proven to be necessary for security under certain conditions. In other conditions, this assumption is not a direct anchoring hardness problem such that breaking it allows an adversary to forge a banknote directly. In particular, for quantum money from knots, even when the path-finding assumption does not hold, an adversary still cannot directly forge a banknote. The adversary needs to additionally prepare the uniform superposition over the paths it finds, which we show is as hard as the original problem. Existing security proofs supplement path-finding hardness with knowledge-of-path assumptions. While this combination is sufficient, it may not be necessary. We identify an assumption pair, preparation assumption and transfer assumption, that is both necessary and sufficient for the security of every invariant money scheme. Breaking either assumption directly enables a forgery. The preparation assumption says that no efficient algorithm, given the serial number of a banknote and one object measured from it, prepares a state that verification accepts. While quantum money security gives a forger one quantum state and asks for two that pass, our assumption concerns a problem that takes only classical inputs and asks for one quantum state that passes. This assumption is equivalent to security against forgers that measure their banknote first. Given that its inputs are classical, it is falsifiable and can be attacked and bounded like other computational problems. The transfer assumption covers forgers that keep the banknote coherent, stating that every such forger only has an advantage over the measure-first adversary by at most a polynomial factor.

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v3 · 2026-11-03 18:48 · 最新观测版本

Anchoring the Security of Invariant Quantum Money

Prior studies on quantum money from knots, and the invariant money framework that generalizes it, anchor their security on the hardness of path-finding. However, we show that the hardness of path-finding is proven to be necessary for security under certain conditions. In other conditions, this assumption is not a direct anchoring hardness problem such that breaking it allows an adversary to forge a banknote directly. In particular, for quantum money from knots, even when the path-finding assumption does not hold, an adversary still cannot directly forge a banknote. The adversary needs to additionally prepare the uniform superposition over the paths it finds, which we show is as hard as the original problem. Existing security proofs supplement path-finding hardness with knowledge-of-path assumptions. While this combination is sufficient, it may not be necessary. We identify an assumption pair, preparation assumption and transfer assumption, that is both necessary and sufficient for the security of every invariant money scheme. Breaking either assumption directly enables a forgery. The preparation assumption says that no efficient algorithm, given the serial number of a banknote and one object measured from it, prepares a state that verification accepts. While quantum money security gives a forger one quantum state and asks for two that pass, our assumption concerns a problem that takes only classical inputs and asks for one quantum state that passes. This assumption is equivalent to security against forgers that measure their banknote first. Given that its inputs are classical, it is falsifiable and can be attacked and bounded like other computational problems. The transfer assumption covers forgers that keep the banknote coherent, stating that every such forger only has an advantage over the measure-first adversary by at most a polynomial factor.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗