跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2610.03335 · v2

Randomization Beyond Deterministic Adaptivity in Parallel Sampling

首次提交 2026-10-02 22:07
版本更新 2026-11-02 11:42
雷达观测 2026-11-04 23:42
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Parallel samplers, including masked diffusion models, generate several coordinates per round from conditional marginals, and their accuracy depends on which coordinates are revealed together. A schedule can be improved in two natural ways: adaptively, by choosing later batches from the values already generated, or by randomization, by drawing the schedule at random. We show that randomization is strictly more powerful. For every $r \geq 1$ we construct a full-support distribution on $9r$ binary coordinates such that every deterministic three-round sampler, even with value-dependent batches and arbitrary product kernels, has forward Kullback-Leibler divergence at least $γr - \log 4$ with $γ\approx 0.0966$, whereas drawing one of four fixed schedules with two fair bits drives the divergence below $18 r β^r$ with $β\approx 0.966$. Both samplers query conditionals of the same target. The separation holds for every fixed number of rounds $T \geq 2$, a strict advantage survives perturbations of the target and errors in the conditional predictor, and exact rational arithmetic certifies the gap at nine coordinates, where trained neural predictors preserve it. The mechanism is a hidden mixture: each schedule preserves the dependence pattern of one component, while no deterministic first batch can serve them all.

作者备注:20 pages

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v2 · 2026-11-02 11:42 · 最新观测版本

Randomization Beyond Deterministic Adaptivity in Parallel Sampling

Parallel samplers, including masked diffusion models, generate several coordinates per round from conditional marginals, and their accuracy depends on which coordinates are revealed together. A schedule can be improved in two natural ways: adaptively, by choosing later batches from the values already generated, or by randomization, by drawing the schedule at random. We show that randomization is strictly more powerful. For every $r \geq 1$ we construct a full-support distribution on $9r$ binary coordinates such that every deterministic three-round sampler, even with value-dependent batches and arbitrary product kernels, has forward Kullback-Leibler divergence at least $γr - \log 4$ with $γ\approx 0.0966$, whereas drawing one of four fixed schedules with two fair bits drives the divergence below $18 r β^r$ with $β\approx 0.966$. Both samplers query conditionals of the same target. The separation holds for every fixed number of rounds $T \geq 2$, a strict advantage survives perturbations of the target and errors in the conditional predictor, and exact rational arithmetic certifies the gap at nine coordinates, where trained neural predictors preserve it. The mechanism is a hidden mixture: each schedule preserves the dependence pattern of one component, while no deterministic first batch can serve them all.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗