← 研踪 PaperTrailarXiv:2610.04898 · v3
A Systematic Analysis of the Predictive Power of LM Surprisal in Reading Chinese
首次提交 2026-10-04 11:19
版本更新 2026-11-03 06:41
雷达观测 2026-11-04 23:40
摘要
This study analyzes the predictive power of LM-derived, token-level surprisal on Mandarin Chinese reading times. Using a suite of Chinese-Pythia models (14M--1.4B) trained from scratch with 30B tokens, we examine how well surprisal predicts first fixation duration, gaze duration, and total reading time in three paragraph-level eye-tracking corpora of Mandarin Chinese (GECO-CN, HKP, and MECO). Contrary to previous null findings, our results show that surprisal is predictive of Chinese reading times. However, whether predictive power scales with model size and the amount of training is corpus-specific: bigger models predict reading times better in GECO-CN, whereas inverse scaling emerges in HKP and, at the largest sizes, in MECO. Subsequently, we find that checkpoints whose surprisal remains closer to $n$-gram statistics are better predictors of reading in HKP and MECO, providing one possible explanation for the inverse scaling behavior. All in all, the predictive power of surprisal on Chinese reading time measurements is corpus-specific, which cautions against drawing conclusions about language model scale from a single corpus.
作者备注:17 pages, 3 figures
观测到的版本
相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。
v3 · 2026-11-03 06:41 · 最新观测版本
A Systematic Analysis of the Predictive Power of LM Surprisal in Reading Chinese
This study analyzes the predictive power of LM-derived, token-level surprisal on Mandarin Chinese reading times. Using a suite of Chinese-Pythia models (14M--1.4B) trained from scratch with 30B tokens, we examine how well surprisal predicts first fixation duration, gaze duration, and total reading time in three paragraph-level eye-tracking corpora of Mandarin Chinese (GECO-CN, HKP, and MECO). Contrary to previous null findings, our results show that surprisal is predictive of Chinese reading times. However, whether predictive power scales with model size and the amount of training is corpus-specific: bigger models predict reading times better in GECO-CN, whereas inverse scaling emerges in HKP and, at the largest sizes, in MECO. Subsequently, we find that checkpoints whose surprisal remains closer to $n$-gram statistics are better predictors of reading in HKP and MECO, providing one possible explanation for the inverse scaling behavior. All in all, the predictive power of surprisal on Chinese reading time measurements is corpus-specific, which cautions against drawing conclusions about language model scale from a single corpus.
查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗