跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2610.07739 · v2

Cite What You Explore: Budget-Aware LLM Reasoning over Medical KGs with Verifiable Evidence

首次提交 2026-10-06 12:36
版本更新 2026-11-04 03:45
雷达观测 2026-11-05 10:08
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Post-discharge risk prediction from electronic health records (EHRs) is difficult because many dependencies that link discharge-time observations to downstream complications, such as comorbidity cascades and drug-disease interactions, are absent from the record. External medical knowledge graphs (KGs) can supply these missing dependencies, but tracing them in a clinical setting demands three properties. KG exploration must remain cost-bounded, retrieved evidence must be differentiated by source quality, and the resulting rationale must be citable for review. Large language models (LLMs) can plan and verify over structured evidence, making them natural candidates for KG reasoning, but existing LLM-based methods do not satisfy these three properties jointly. In this paper, we propose BAR, a Budget-Aware LLM Reasoning framework over medical KGs with three contributions. First, BAR refines the raw KG into disease-specific evidence graphs whose edges carry support scores and provenance records, turning the KG into a quality-annotated reasoning space rather than a static feature source. Second, an LLM reasons over this graph through a plan-navigate-verify loop that decomposes the question into steps, retrieves evidence under a patient-specific budget, and revises when verification fails. Third, a reasoning policy is trained with a reward that compares predictions with and without acquired evidence, combined with acquisition cost and citation-integrity terms. Across 8 diseases and 3 prediction horizons on MIMIC-III and MIMIC-IV, BAR achieves higher performance and citation precision than strong baselines while using fewer LLM tokens. Its gain over EHR-only prediction grows at longer horizons, and its advantage carries over to an external benchmark.

作者备注:Accepted to NeurIPS 2026. This revision corrects cohort statistics and efficiency reporting, removes incorrectly reported per-disease standard deviations, clarifies experimental protocols, and adds evaluations. Code: https://github.com/ChenC2002/BAR

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v2 · 2026-11-04 03:45 · 最新观测版本

Cite What You Explore: Budget-Aware LLM Reasoning over Medical KGs with Verifiable Evidence

Post-discharge risk prediction from electronic health records (EHRs) is difficult because many dependencies that link discharge-time observations to downstream complications, such as comorbidity cascades and drug-disease interactions, are absent from the record. External medical knowledge graphs (KGs) can supply these missing dependencies, but tracing them in a clinical setting demands three properties. KG exploration must remain cost-bounded, retrieved evidence must be differentiated by source quality, and the resulting rationale must be citable for review. Large language models (LLMs) can plan and verify over structured evidence, making them natural candidates for KG reasoning, but existing LLM-based methods do not satisfy these three properties jointly. In this paper, we propose BAR, a Budget-Aware LLM Reasoning framework over medical KGs with three contributions. First, BAR refines the raw KG into disease-specific evidence graphs whose edges carry support scores and provenance records, turning the KG into a quality-annotated reasoning space rather than a static feature source. Second, an LLM reasons over this graph through a plan-navigate-verify loop that decomposes the question into steps, retrieves evidence under a patient-specific budget, and revises when verification fails. Third, a reasoning policy is trained with a reward that compares predictions with and without acquired evidence, combined with acquisition cost and citation-integrity terms. Across 8 diseases and 3 prediction horizons on MIMIC-III and MIMIC-IV, BAR achieves higher performance and citation precision than strong baselines while using fewer LLM tokens. Its gain over EHR-only prediction grows at longer horizons, and its advantage carries over to an external benchmark.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗