跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2610.23298 · v2

How the elastic axis folds the transonic flutter boundary: shock energy transfer and conformally calibrated active learning

首次提交 2026-10-16 19:04
版本更新 2026-11-08 01:01
雷达观测 2026-11-10 11:14
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Isogai's case A, a pitch-plunge aerofoil whose elastic axis lies half a chord ahead of the leading edge, has a folded transonic flutter boundary in inviscid flow, with several flutter speeds at one Mach number. We map this boundary and its elastic-axis family with coupled Euler simulations, a Gaussian-process surrogate of the damping trained by batch active learning, and distribution-free split conformal prediction, which bounds the marginal error rate of stability calls. Three failure modes of damping labels are invisible in the residuals, and the half-degree mean incidence left by an impulsive start at $1^\circ$ freestream incidence raises the flutter speed at the dip by 2.8%, more than any numerical setting. With 80 simulations the learned case A boundary labels 63 of 64 independent runs correctly, and at most 1.8% of calibrated calls on held-out runs are wrong. Over Mach number, elastic axis and flutter speed index, 193 simulations show that, for the case A structure about the axis, the inviscid fold exists only for axes more than about 0.4 chord ahead of the leading edge, on two meshes. Chordwise energy budgets, closed three ways, explain both branches. On the lower branch the falling reduced frequency, at unchanged shock phase, raises the shock input and lowers the upstream damping similarly. On the upper branch the shock is pinned at the trailing edge; moving the axis aft brings the flutter-mode pivot towards the section, so the upstream damping falls faster than the residual shock input and the fold closes.

作者备注:28 pages, 15 figures, 8 tables. Accepted for publication in Transport Phenomena (Special Edition: Tribute to John Charles Slattery). Code and data: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23415511

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v2 · 2026-11-08 01:01 · 最新观测版本

How the elastic axis folds the transonic flutter boundary: shock energy transfer and conformally calibrated active learning

Isogai's case A, a pitch-plunge aerofoil whose elastic axis lies half a chord ahead of the leading edge, has a folded transonic flutter boundary in inviscid flow, with several flutter speeds at one Mach number. We map this boundary and its elastic-axis family with coupled Euler simulations, a Gaussian-process surrogate of the damping trained by batch active learning, and distribution-free split conformal prediction, which bounds the marginal error rate of stability calls. Three failure modes of damping labels are invisible in the residuals, and the half-degree mean incidence left by an impulsive start at $1^\circ$ freestream incidence raises the flutter speed at the dip by 2.8%, more than any numerical setting. With 80 simulations the learned case A boundary labels 63 of 64 independent runs correctly, and at most 1.8% of calibrated calls on held-out runs are wrong. Over Mach number, elastic axis and flutter speed index, 193 simulations show that, for the case A structure about the axis, the inviscid fold exists only for axes more than about 0.4 chord ahead of the leading edge, on two meshes. Chordwise energy budgets, closed three ways, explain both branches. On the lower branch the falling reduced frequency, at unchanged shock phase, raises the shock input and lowers the upstream damping similarly. On the upper branch the shock is pinned at the trailing edge; moving the axis aft brings the flutter-mode pivot towards the section, so the upstream damping falls faster than the residual shock input and the fold closes.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗