跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2610.24888 · v2

Measuring Data Diversity with Embeddings: A Taxonomy and Benchmark for Diversity Measures

首次提交 2026-10-18 06:09
版本更新 2026-10-29 19:02
雷达观测 2026-10-30 13:28
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Diversity is a critical property of text corpora, with direct implications for training data curation, test set design, and model generalization. However, its measurement remains fragmented and poorly understood. Existing embedding-based diversity measures vary widely in how they are computed and can yield substantially different diversity scores on the same data, yet no systematic comparison of their empirical behaviour exists. We make two contributions toward addressing this gap. First, we present a taxonomy of 21 embedding-based diversity measures, organizing them into four families based on their underlying computations. Second, we introduce EmbDivBench, a benchmark that evaluates these measures along three conceptually distinct components (variety, balance and disparity) on both simulated and natural text data. Although Mean Pairwise Distance is the most commonly used measure, our experiments show that it is outperformed by several alternatives on the three diversity components, with Graph Entropy being the best choice overall. Lastly, we distil these findings into practical recommendations for diversity measure selection.

作者备注:Published in the Proceedings of EMNLP 2026 (Main), pages 11241-11271. Code and data: https://github.com/nlpsoc/EmbDivBench

期刊信息:Proceedings of the 2026 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 11241-11271, Budapest, Hungary. Association for Computational Linguistics

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v2 · 2026-10-29 19:02 · 最新观测版本

Measuring Data Diversity with Embeddings: A Taxonomy and Benchmark for Diversity Measures

Diversity is a critical property of text corpora, with direct implications for training data curation, test set design, and model generalization. However, its measurement remains fragmented and poorly understood. Existing embedding-based diversity measures vary widely in how they are computed and can yield substantially different diversity scores on the same data, yet no systematic comparison of their empirical behaviour exists. We make two contributions toward addressing this gap. First, we present a taxonomy of 21 embedding-based diversity measures, organizing them into four families based on their underlying computations. Second, we introduce EmbDivBench, a benchmark that evaluates these measures along three conceptually distinct components (variety, balance and disparity) on both simulated and natural text data. Although Mean Pairwise Distance is the most commonly used measure, our experiments show that it is outperformed by several alternatives on the three diversity components, with Graph Entropy being the best choice overall. Lastly, we distil these findings into practical recommendations for diversity measure selection.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗