跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2610.34617 · v1

Valid Early Detection of Memorization in Diffusion Models

首次提交 2026-10-26 06:28
版本更新 2026-10-26 06:28
雷达观测 2026-10-29 00:36
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Diffusion models can sometimes reproduce examples from their training data, a phenomenon known as memorization. Existing memorization detection methods for unconditional diffusion models typically operate at a pre-selected timestep and therefore cannot adapt the detection time to the evolving denoising trajectory. Sequential monitoring enables adaptive detection but repeated testing across timesteps complicates trajectory-level false-alarm control. We study two ways of combining split conformal calibration with sequential monitoring for prompt-free memorization detection: per-step Bonferroni calibration and direct trajectory-level calibration of the maximum memorization score. The former controls repeated testing by splitting the false-alarm budget across timesteps, whereas the latter calibrates the event of ever crossing a threshold directly through the trajectory-level maximum. We evaluate this formulation on an unconditional CIFAR-10 EDM using two complementary per-step statistics based on geometry and representation spikiness. Experiments show that sequential monitoring improves the power-timing tradeoff over fixed-time detection. Compared with Bonferroni calibration, trajectory-level calibration achieves comparable detection power while using the false-alarm budget less conservatively and enabling earlier detection at higher noise levels.

作者备注:Extended version of a 4-page paper accepted as a poster at the NeurIPS 2026 Workshop on E-Values: From Statistics to ML. 13 pages, 3 figures, 2 tables

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-10-26 06:28 · 最新观测版本

Valid Early Detection of Memorization in Diffusion Models

Diffusion models can sometimes reproduce examples from their training data, a phenomenon known as memorization. Existing memorization detection methods for unconditional diffusion models typically operate at a pre-selected timestep and therefore cannot adapt the detection time to the evolving denoising trajectory. Sequential monitoring enables adaptive detection but repeated testing across timesteps complicates trajectory-level false-alarm control. We study two ways of combining split conformal calibration with sequential monitoring for prompt-free memorization detection: per-step Bonferroni calibration and direct trajectory-level calibration of the maximum memorization score. The former controls repeated testing by splitting the false-alarm budget across timesteps, whereas the latter calibrates the event of ever crossing a threshold directly through the trajectory-level maximum. We evaluate this formulation on an unconditional CIFAR-10 EDM using two complementary per-step statistics based on geometry and representation spikiness. Experiments show that sequential monitoring improves the power-timing tradeoff over fixed-time detection. Compared with Bonferroni calibration, trajectory-level calibration achieves comparable detection power while using the false-alarm budget less conservatively and enabling earlier detection at higher noise levels.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗