跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2610.34682 · v2

Beyond Multiplicity Correction: Sharp Retrieval Thresholds for Attention with Correlated Distractors

首次提交 2026-10-26 09:19
版本更新 2026-10-28 16:29
雷达观测 2026-10-30 10:22
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Redundant context affects attention in two distinct ways: multiplicity adds normalization mass, while score variation within correlated groups can produce extreme individual scores. We separate these effects in a planted retrieval model with exponentially many Gaussian distractors organized into supplied clusters whose number and size both grow exponentially with dimension. The model is a two-level generalized random energy model, whose classical free energy yields exact retrieval thresholds. Gaussian interpolation further shows that increasing positive correlation at fixed token count lowers the distractor free energy, unlike adding duplicates. Our main result establishes a sharp limitation of count correction, which subtracts the log cluster size from pre-softmax scores: this correction removes multiplicity but retains within-cluster extremes. Even when the inverse temperature is chosen after observing all scores, count correction requires a signal at least $\sqrt{2α_1}$, where $α_1$ is the exponential growth rate of the number of clusters. By contrast, averaging scores before exponentiation suppresses token-level fluctuations and lowers the optimal signal threshold to $\sqrt{2ρα_1}$, where $ρ$ is the within-cluster correlation. This gap persists after adding exponentially many singleton distractors, so group size alone does not identify the target, and extends, under explicit cumulant regularity assumptions, to fixed finite hierarchies of independent-increment scores. Finite-sample, stability, and participation results complement the asymptotic analysis. A controlled retrieval experiment with frozen sentence embeddings illustrates both sides of the distinction: averaging helps when the relevant item is a singleton, but can discard useful evidence when a relevant group contains multiple matching items.

作者备注:42 pages, 2 figures, 3 tables

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

仅对比实际观测的元数据,不代表 PDF 正文或实验变化。版本可能不连续;带删除线为移除,下划线为新增。

标题变化

Beyond DeduplicationMultiplicity Correction: Sharp Retrieval LimitsThresholds for Attention with Correlated Distractors

摘要变化

Redundant context affects attention throughin two distinct mechanismsways: repeated itemsmultiplicity addadds normalization mass, while score variation within correlated groups can produce extreme individual scores. We separate these effects in a planted retrieval model with exponentially many Gaussian distractors arrangedorganized ininto known,supplied clusters whose number and size both grow exponentially largewith clustersdimension. The model is a two-level generalized random energy model, whose classical free energy yields exact retrieval thresholds. Gaussian interpolation further shows that increasing positive correlation at fixed token count lowers the distractor free energy, unlike adding duplicates. Our main result identifiesestablishes a sharp limitation of subtractingcount correction, which subtracts the log cluster size from pre-softmax scores: this correction removes multiplicity but retains within-cluster extremes. Even awhen the inverse temperature is chosen after observing all scores, cannotcount lowercorrection therequires requireda signal belowat least $\sqrt{2α_1}$, where $α_1$ is the exponential growth rate of the number of clusters. AveragingBy contrast, averaging scores before exponentiation instead suppresses thesetoken-level fluctuations and achieveslowers the optimal signal threshold to $\sqrt{2ρα_1}$, where $ρ$ is the within-cluster correlation. TheThis gap persists after adding exponentially many singleton distractors, so group size alone does not identify the target, and extends, under explicit cumulant regularity assumptions, to fixed finite hierarchies of light-tailed independent-increment scores. Finite-sample, stability, and participation results complement the asymptotic analysis. A controlled retrieval experiment with frozen sentence embeddings supports thisillustrates distinctionboth whilesides delineatingof itsthe scopedistinction: averaging helps when the relevant item is a singleton, but can discard useful evidence when a relevant group contains multiple matching items.

作者备注变化

2942 pages, 2 figures, 3 tables

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v2 · 2026-10-28 16:29 · 最新观测版本

Beyond Multiplicity Correction: Sharp Retrieval Thresholds for Attention with Correlated Distractors

Redundant context affects attention in two distinct ways: multiplicity adds normalization mass, while score variation within correlated groups can produce extreme individual scores. We separate these effects in a planted retrieval model with exponentially many Gaussian distractors organized into supplied clusters whose number and size both grow exponentially with dimension. The model is a two-level generalized random energy model, whose classical free energy yields exact retrieval thresholds. Gaussian interpolation further shows that increasing positive correlation at fixed token count lowers the distractor free energy, unlike adding duplicates. Our main result establishes a sharp limitation of count correction, which subtracts the log cluster size from pre-softmax scores: this correction removes multiplicity but retains within-cluster extremes. Even when the inverse temperature is chosen after observing all scores, count correction requires a signal at least $\sqrt{2α_1}$, where $α_1$ is the exponential growth rate of the number of clusters. By contrast, averaging scores before exponentiation suppresses token-level fluctuations and lowers the optimal signal threshold to $\sqrt{2ρα_1}$, where $ρ$ is the within-cluster correlation. This gap persists after adding exponentially many singleton distractors, so group size alone does not identify the target, and extends, under explicit cumulant regularity assumptions, to fixed finite hierarchies of independent-increment scores. Finite-sample, stability, and participation results complement the asymptotic analysis. A controlled retrieval experiment with frozen sentence embeddings illustrates both sides of the distinction: averaging helps when the relevant item is a singleton, but can discard useful evidence when a relevant group contains multiple matching items.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗
v1 · 2026-10-26 09:19

Beyond Deduplication: Sharp Retrieval Limits for Attention with Correlated Distractors

Redundant context affects attention through two distinct mechanisms: repeated items add normalization mass, while score variation within correlated groups can produce extreme individual scores. We separate these effects in a planted retrieval model with exponentially many Gaussian distractors arranged in known, exponentially large clusters. The model is a two-level generalized random energy model, whose classical free energy yields exact retrieval thresholds. Gaussian interpolation further shows that increasing positive correlation at fixed token count lowers the distractor free energy, unlike adding duplicates. Our main result identifies a sharp limitation of subtracting log cluster size from pre-softmax scores: this correction removes multiplicity but retains within-cluster extremes. Even a temperature chosen after observing all scores cannot lower the required signal below $\sqrt{2α_1}$, where $α_1$ is the exponential rate of the number of clusters. Averaging scores before exponentiation instead suppresses these fluctuations and achieves $\sqrt{2ρα_1}$, where $ρ$ is the within-cluster correlation. The gap persists after adding exponentially many singleton distractors, so group size alone does not identify the target, and extends to fixed finite hierarchies of light-tailed independent-increment scores. Finite-sample, stability, and participation results complement the asymptotic analysis. A controlled retrieval experiment with frozen sentence embeddings supports this distinction while delineating its scope: averaging helps when the relevant item is a singleton, but can discard useful evidence when a relevant group contains multiple matching items.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗