跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2610.36408 · v1

Cross-Day Compatibility of Daily Item Embeddings: An Empirical Study of Alignment, Scale Management, and CTR Adaptation

首次提交 2026-10-27 07:42
版本更新 2026-10-27 07:42
雷达观测 2026-10-29 00:35
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Daily item co-occurrence embeddings are paired with next-day behavior without future-behavior leakage. Multi-day click-through rate (CTR) training therefore mixes versions whose directions and norms may differ for the same item. We compare Word2Vec and an item-graph XSimGCL adaptation across initialization, inheritance, post-processing, training constraints, and downstream augmentation. The inventory contains 48 configurations, including 32 common-protocol CTR evaluations. Observed metrics are reported as relative percentage changes from the corresponding Word2Vec baseline (0%), with raw values and exact dataset sizes withheld. Three findings emerge. First, multiple upstream interventions improve compatibility and CTR. ID-init and orthogonal alignment increase cosine by 51.2% and 93.4%, and GAUC by 2.2% and 2.6%, relative to ordinary Word2Vec. Retrieval and geometry remain insufficient downstream surrogates. Second, warm starts perform strongly but accumulate scale. The day-matched norm increase over Word2Vec reaches 102.5% after eight days; daily global rescaling limits it to 8.2% and attains the highest observed GAUC increase, 4.0%. Third, CTR learning through a dimensionality-reducing encoder further adapts to residual drift. Against dimension-matched random-projection, SVD, and untrained-network controls, trained encoders attain the highest cross-day cosine for four of six upstream methods. The other two rank third and second in train-to-test cosine. These industrial results support complementary roles for upstream stabilization, inherited-scale management, and downstream task learning.

作者备注:19 pages, 1 figure, 8 tables. Supplementary material: 10 pages, 8 figures, 2 tables. Includes the complete 48-configuration inventory

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-10-27 07:42 · 最新观测版本

Cross-Day Compatibility of Daily Item Embeddings: An Empirical Study of Alignment, Scale Management, and CTR Adaptation

Daily item co-occurrence embeddings are paired with next-day behavior without future-behavior leakage. Multi-day click-through rate (CTR) training therefore mixes versions whose directions and norms may differ for the same item. We compare Word2Vec and an item-graph XSimGCL adaptation across initialization, inheritance, post-processing, training constraints, and downstream augmentation. The inventory contains 48 configurations, including 32 common-protocol CTR evaluations. Observed metrics are reported as relative percentage changes from the corresponding Word2Vec baseline (0%), with raw values and exact dataset sizes withheld. Three findings emerge. First, multiple upstream interventions improve compatibility and CTR. ID-init and orthogonal alignment increase cosine by 51.2% and 93.4%, and GAUC by 2.2% and 2.6%, relative to ordinary Word2Vec. Retrieval and geometry remain insufficient downstream surrogates. Second, warm starts perform strongly but accumulate scale. The day-matched norm increase over Word2Vec reaches 102.5% after eight days; daily global rescaling limits it to 8.2% and attains the highest observed GAUC increase, 4.0%. Third, CTR learning through a dimensionality-reducing encoder further adapts to residual drift. Against dimension-matched random-projection, SVD, and untrained-network controls, trained encoders attain the highest cross-day cosine for four of six upstream methods. The other two rank third and second in train-to-test cosine. These industrial results support complementary roles for upstream stabilization, inherited-scale management, and downstream task learning.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗