← 研踪 PaperTrailarXiv:2610.37112 · v1
Decoupling Procedural and Outcome Fairness in Seed Allocation for Influence Maximization
首次提交 2026-10-27 20:08
版本更新 2026-10-27 20:08
雷达观测 2026-10-29 00:35
摘要
On online social platforms, equal seed access to interventions can yield unequal group outcomes through social spillovers, so an access audit alone can miss outcome disparities. We characterise this trade-off through an exact allocation-structure decomposition and a sharp first-moment floor for graph-independent seeding under additive spillovers on stochastic block networks. Decoupled Procedural Allocation (DPA) combines group quotas with selection by seeds' contributions to each group's outcome. Rankings balance total outcome against disparity, and within-quota exchanges reduce the gap. Computable bounds quantify retained total outcome. DPA achieves the smallest mean outcome gap among the compared methods at the common access tolerances on both development and prospective suites. Exposure and independent-cascade studies show how the propagation mechanism changes this trade-off. On Pokec, DPA nearly equalises modelled gender outcomes at the closest access-parity quota while preserving most of the degree-based allocation's total outcome.
作者备注：9 pages, 4 figures
观测到的版本
相邻记录可能跳过中间版本；首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。
v1 · 2026-10-27 20:08 · 最新观测版本
Decoupling Procedural and Outcome Fairness in Seed Allocation for Influence Maximization
On online social platforms, equal seed access to interventions can yield unequal group outcomes through social spillovers, so an access audit alone can miss outcome disparities. We characterise this trade-off through an exact allocation-structure decomposition and a sharp first-moment floor for graph-independent seeding under additive spillovers on stochastic block networks. Decoupled Procedural Allocation (DPA) combines group quotas with selection by seeds' contributions to each group's outcome. Rankings balance total outcome against disparity, and within-quota exchanges reduce the gap. Computable bounds quantify retained total outcome. DPA achieves the smallest mean outcome gap among the compared methods at the common access tolerances on both development and prospective suites. Exposure and independent-cascade studies show how the propagation mechanism changes this trade-off. On Pokec, DPA nearly equalises modelled gender outcomes at the closest access-parity quota while preserving most of the degree-based allocation's total outcome.
查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗