← 研踪 PaperTrailarXiv:2610.37361 · v1
Online Interval Selection with Binary Predictions: Optimal Consistency and a Continuous Robustness Tradeoff
首次提交 2026-10-27 22:56
版本更新 2026-10-27 22:56
雷达观测 2026-10-29 00:34
摘要
We study online interval selection with binary predictions of membership in a final optimal solution. Requests arrive in arbitrary order; accepted requests may be revoked, but rejected or revoked requests cannot be recovered. With rewards proportional to interval length, the best consistency under finite strict robustness is $d=(3+\sqrt5)/2$ when both guarantees hold almost surely on each fixed input, including for randomized algorithms. A continuous lower bound forces consistency strictly above $d$ at every robustness budget below $4\varphi+3\approx9.472$, whereas our deterministic algorithm attains $d$ with exact robustness $\varphi^5\approx11.090$, where $\varphi=(1+\sqrt5)/2$. Each held interval inherits a ledger recording positive prediction mass lost through irrevocable decisions. A tunable replacement cost gives a continuous family with exact consistency throughout and exact robustness on two parameter intervals, including $(C,R)=(25/9,10)$ and $(4,7)$. Randomization permits expected consistency approaching one with finite expected robustness, whereas almost-sure robustness forces expected consistency strictly above two at every finite budget.
作者备注：66 pages, 5 figures. Includes a technical appendix and ancillary evidence tables
观测到的版本
相邻记录可能跳过中间版本；首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。
v1 · 2026-10-27 22:56 · 最新观测版本
Online Interval Selection with Binary Predictions: Optimal Consistency and a Continuous Robustness Tradeoff
We study online interval selection with binary predictions of membership in a final optimal solution. Requests arrive in arbitrary order; accepted requests may be revoked, but rejected or revoked requests cannot be recovered. With rewards proportional to interval length, the best consistency under finite strict robustness is $d=(3+\sqrt5)/2$ when both guarantees hold almost surely on each fixed input, including for randomized algorithms. A continuous lower bound forces consistency strictly above $d$ at every robustness budget below $4\varphi+3\approx9.472$, whereas our deterministic algorithm attains $d$ with exact robustness $\varphi^5\approx11.090$, where $\varphi=(1+\sqrt5)/2$. Each held interval inherits a ledger recording positive prediction mass lost through irrevocable decisions. A tunable replacement cost gives a continuous family with exact consistency throughout and exact robustness on two parameter intervals, including $(C,R)=(25/9,10)$ and $(4,7)$. Randomization permits expected consistency approaching one with finite expected robustness, whereas almost-sure robustness forces expected consistency strictly above two at every finite budget.
查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗