跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2610.37838 · v1

TensorBound: Characterizing Tensor Binding Failures in AI Compiler and Runtime Stacks

首次提交 2026-10-28 02:51
版本更新 2026-10-28 02:51
雷达观测 2026-10-30 10:23
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

AI compiler and runtime stacks must preserve bindings between tensor values and their operations, storage, and execution state. These bindings can fail while the underlying objects remain present, with symptoms appearing in another layer. We present TensorBound, an empirical study of tensor binding failures in IREE and the XLA and PyTorch ecosystems. The study analyzes 264 reports and reconstructs 149 distinct repaired causes through source tracing and comparisons of pre-fix and repaired revisions. Each reconstruction connects the first invalid decision to its violated condition, physical effect, and repair. Missing eligibility checks, incorrect mappings or translations, and lost or omitted relations account for 69.1% of repaired causes. These patterns highlight the need to preserve binding facts and check the conditions for their use. The 101 first invalid decisions in compiler code identify candidate checking points before execution. Four archived IREE diagnostic attempts distinguish effect localization from source-based cause explanation. Together, these findings motivate transition-specific checks that preserve binding facts across representations and enforce the required conditions at consuming decisions.

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-10-28 02:51 · 最新观测版本

TensorBound: Characterizing Tensor Binding Failures in AI Compiler and Runtime Stacks

AI compiler and runtime stacks must preserve bindings between tensor values and their operations, storage, and execution state. These bindings can fail while the underlying objects remain present, with symptoms appearing in another layer. We present TensorBound, an empirical study of tensor binding failures in IREE and the XLA and PyTorch ecosystems. The study analyzes 264 reports and reconstructs 149 distinct repaired causes through source tracing and comparisons of pre-fix and repaired revisions. Each reconstruction connects the first invalid decision to its violated condition, physical effect, and repair. Missing eligibility checks, incorrect mappings or translations, and lost or omitted relations account for 69.1% of repaired causes. These patterns highlight the need to preserve binding facts and check the conditions for their use. The 101 first invalid decisions in compiler code identify candidate checking points before execution. Four archived IREE diagnostic attempts distinguish effect localization from source-based cause explanation. Together, these findings motivate transition-specific checks that preserve binding facts across representations and enforce the required conditions at consuming decisions.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗