跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2610.38193 · v1

Barren Plateaus in Quantum Linear Combinations: Interference and Lie-Algebraic Control

首次提交 2026-10-28 10:39
版本更新 2026-10-28 10:39
雷达观测 2026-10-30 09:53
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

A coherent sum of quantum circuits introduces interference that can alter the training signal. We distinguish a single linear combination of unitaries (LCU) from a circuit that repeatedly alternates branch operations and ancilla mixing. For a single-pass LCU, independent branches with zero matrix means cannot erase the differentiated branch's gradient variance: the total variance is at least the branch variance times the fourth power of its coefficient magnitude. This bound holds at any gate position and does not require the circuit unitaries to be Haar-random. Beyond this lower bound, we derive exact loss and gradient formulas that quantify the additional contributions from interference between branches. One of these terms depends on relative coefficient phases and vanishes when the branch ensemble is invariant under multiplication by $i \mathbb{I}$; a four-qubit matchgate example shows that it can be nonzero. For repeated interleaving with full special-unitary ancilla control, we determine the generated Lie algebra from the associative algebra of the branches, including the available central phase directions. This control result predicts concentration only with additional assumptions on circuit sampling. Matchgate examples exhibit polynomial single-pass LCU variances and exponential concentration under joint Haar-random sampling. We also derive coefficient-selection rules and bounds for postselection, measurement error, and approximate moments.

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-10-28 10:39 · 最新观测版本

Barren Plateaus in Quantum Linear Combinations: Interference and Lie-Algebraic Control

A coherent sum of quantum circuits introduces interference that can alter the training signal. We distinguish a single linear combination of unitaries (LCU) from a circuit that repeatedly alternates branch operations and ancilla mixing. For a single-pass LCU, independent branches with zero matrix means cannot erase the differentiated branch's gradient variance: the total variance is at least the branch variance times the fourth power of its coefficient magnitude. This bound holds at any gate position and does not require the circuit unitaries to be Haar-random. Beyond this lower bound, we derive exact loss and gradient formulas that quantify the additional contributions from interference between branches. One of these terms depends on relative coefficient phases and vanishes when the branch ensemble is invariant under multiplication by $i \mathbb{I}$; a four-qubit matchgate example shows that it can be nonzero. For repeated interleaving with full special-unitary ancilla control, we determine the generated Lie algebra from the associative algebra of the branches, including the available central phase directions. This control result predicts concentration only with additional assumptions on circuit sampling. Matchgate examples exhibit polynomial single-pass LCU variances and exponential concentration under joint Haar-random sampling. We also derive coefficient-selection rules and bounds for postselection, measurement error, and approximate moments.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗