跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2610.38976 · v1

The Utility of Physics-Informed Machine Learning in Solar Power Production Forecasting

首次提交 2026-10-29 06:01
版本更新 2026-10-29 06:01
雷达观测 2026-10-30 11:25
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Physics-informed machine learning (PIML) and hybrid modeling have attracted significant attention as approaches for combining physical knowledge with the flexibility of deep learning. In this work, we investigate whether these approaches deliver their commonly claimed benefits for large-scale photovoltaic (PV) power forecasting. We develop two hybrid forecasting architectures that integrate the ADR physical PV efficiency model with the TSMixer neural forecasting architecture through feature augmentation and residual learning. The proposed models are evaluated on a dataset comprising over 3 million samples from 3,713 PV installations across 33 European countries. We assess convergence speed, forecasting accuracy, transferability across geographical regions, and data efficiency. Although the physics-informed models seem to exhibit slightly faster convergence during training, they do not achieve consistent improvements in test-set accuracy, generalization, or performance under limited training data compared to the purely data-driven baseline. These findings suggest that, for modern deep forecasting architectures trained on large datasets, explicitly incorporating the ADR physical model provides limited practical benefit for day-ahead PV forecasting.

作者备注:Submitted to Solar Energy

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-10-29 06:01 · 最新观测版本

The Utility of Physics-Informed Machine Learning in Solar Power Production Forecasting

Physics-informed machine learning (PIML) and hybrid modeling have attracted significant attention as approaches for combining physical knowledge with the flexibility of deep learning. In this work, we investigate whether these approaches deliver their commonly claimed benefits for large-scale photovoltaic (PV) power forecasting. We develop two hybrid forecasting architectures that integrate the ADR physical PV efficiency model with the TSMixer neural forecasting architecture through feature augmentation and residual learning. The proposed models are evaluated on a dataset comprising over 3 million samples from 3,713 PV installations across 33 European countries. We assess convergence speed, forecasting accuracy, transferability across geographical regions, and data efficiency. Although the physics-informed models seem to exhibit slightly faster convergence during training, they do not achieve consistent improvements in test-set accuracy, generalization, or performance under limited training data compared to the purely data-driven baseline. These findings suggest that, for modern deep forecasting architectures trained on large datasets, explicitly incorporating the ADR physical model provides limited practical benefit for day-ahead PV forecasting.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗