跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2610.39072 · v1

PhysicsNeMo-Mesh: GPU-Native Meshes and Simulation Cases for Physics AI

首次提交 2026-10-29 08:02
版本更新 2026-10-29 08:02
雷达观测 2026-10-30 11:25
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

PhysicsNeMo-Mesh is the mesh module of the open-source PhysicsNeMo library. It provides mesh processing similar to PyVista, but on the GPU, in batches, and inside PyTorch's automatic differentiation. Like xarray for unstructured meshes, it attaches semantics to data: fields on points, cells, and whole meshes have names and shapes, and a simulation case keeps the complete PDE problem specification, including boundary conditions and their prescribed values. It addresses three problems that plague machine learning for physical simulation. First, GPU utilization is bottlenecked by I/O, because samples are very large relative to the compute per forward pass. Second, because traditional preprocessing is expensive, it is necessarily done once, during curation, rather than differently for each model and workflow at the point of use. Finally, advanced equivariant and mesh-native architectures require information that curation ordinarily discards. Fast GPU mesh processing makes it practical to preprocess at the point of use: on one GB200 GPU, mesh operations run $6.2\text{--}1{,}068\times$ faster than VTK with 72 threads, and loading a whole case is $8.0\text{--}88\times$ faster than reading its VTK files ($8.0\times$ when both read the same fields). Overlapped with training, this preprocessing costs $2.1\%$ of throughput for a $127\,\text{ms}$ Transolver step. So one dataset serves many models and workflows: in PhysicsNeMo's public recipe, one stored DrivAerML dataset feeds Transolver, GeoTransolver, and GLOBE. PhysicsNeMo-Mesh combines the speed of an intermediate array store with the flexibility of an archival format such as VTK. When shapes and wall conditions both vary, per-boundary conditions cut a heat-conduction error from $87\%$ to $6\text{--}9\%$. And by keeping field ranks and named boundaries, it retains the semantic structure that next-generation architectures will need.

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-10-29 08:02 · 最新观测版本

PhysicsNeMo-Mesh: GPU-Native Meshes and Simulation Cases for Physics AI

PhysicsNeMo-Mesh is the mesh module of the open-source PhysicsNeMo library. It provides mesh processing similar to PyVista, but on the GPU, in batches, and inside PyTorch's automatic differentiation. Like xarray for unstructured meshes, it attaches semantics to data: fields on points, cells, and whole meshes have names and shapes, and a simulation case keeps the complete PDE problem specification, including boundary conditions and their prescribed values. It addresses three problems that plague machine learning for physical simulation. First, GPU utilization is bottlenecked by I/O, because samples are very large relative to the compute per forward pass. Second, because traditional preprocessing is expensive, it is necessarily done once, during curation, rather than differently for each model and workflow at the point of use. Finally, advanced equivariant and mesh-native architectures require information that curation ordinarily discards. Fast GPU mesh processing makes it practical to preprocess at the point of use: on one GB200 GPU, mesh operations run $6.2\text{--}1{,}068\times$ faster than VTK with 72 threads, and loading a whole case is $8.0\text{--}88\times$ faster than reading its VTK files ($8.0\times$ when both read the same fields). Overlapped with training, this preprocessing costs $2.1\%$ of throughput for a $127\,\text{ms}$ Transolver step. So one dataset serves many models and workflows: in PhysicsNeMo's public recipe, one stored DrivAerML dataset feeds Transolver, GeoTransolver, and GLOBE. PhysicsNeMo-Mesh combines the speed of an intermediate array store with the flexibility of an archival format such as VTK. When shapes and wall conditions both vary, per-boundary conditions cut a heat-conduction error from $87\%$ to $6\text{--}9\%$. And by keeping field ranks and named boundaries, it retains the semantic structure that next-generation architectures will need.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗