跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2610.40290 · v1

Leveraging Recourse and Size Bounds for OnlineKnapsack with Removable Items

首次提交 2026-10-29 23:40
版本更新 2026-10-29 23:40
雷达观测 2026-10-30 13:28
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

In the online unweighted knapsack problem, items arrive sequentially and must be accepted or rejected immediately for a bounded-capacity knapsack, aiming to maximize the total size of accepted items. When decisions are irrevocable, no algorithm achieves a non-trivial competitive ratio. An essential relaxation that circumvents this impossibility is to allow previously accepted items to be removed from the knapsack (a.k.a. removal). In this work, we investigate possible further improvements on the competitive ratio with removal by bringing together two other previously proposed model extensions: knowledge of an upper bound on the item sizes (a.k.a. bound awareness) and ability to reinsert previously rejected items(a.k.a.recourse). Our contributions are twofold. First, we establish close upper and lower bounds on the competitive ratio under bound awareness, removal and recourse. We show that significant improvements on the best known competitive ratio are possible when the upper bound on the item sizes is not too restrictive and only few uses of recourse are available. Second, we introduce the notion of adaptive online algorithms which do not require to know any upper bound on the item sizes but still achieve performance guarantees comparable to the ones obtained under the bound awareness model.

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

该论文研究在线无权重背包问题,在允许移除已接受物品的基础上,结合物品规模上界知识与有限追索权(重新插入曾被拒物品),给出竞争比的紧界并提出自适应在线算法。

正在读取账号与研究记录…

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-10-29 23:40 · 最新观测版本

Leveraging Recourse and Size Bounds for OnlineKnapsack with Removable Items

In the online unweighted knapsack problem, items arrive sequentially and must be accepted or rejected immediately for a bounded-capacity knapsack, aiming to maximize the total size of accepted items. When decisions are irrevocable, no algorithm achieves a non-trivial competitive ratio. An essential relaxation that circumvents this impossibility is to allow previously accepted items to be removed from the knapsack (a.k.a. removal). In this work, we investigate possible further improvements on the competitive ratio with removal by bringing together two other previously proposed model extensions: knowledge of an upper bound on the item sizes (a.k.a. bound awareness) and ability to reinsert previously rejected items(a.k.a.recourse). Our contributions are twofold. First, we establish close upper and lower bounds on the competitive ratio under bound awareness, removal and recourse. We show that significant improvements on the best known competitive ratio are possible when the upper bound on the item sizes is not too restrictive and only few uses of recourse are available. Second, we introduce the notion of adaptive online algorithms which do not require to know any upper bound on the item sizes but still achieve performance guarantees comparable to the ones obtained under the bound awareness model.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗