跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.01553 · v1

A Deterministic O(log m)-Competitive Algorithm for Online Minimum Cost Bipartite Matching with Delays

首次提交 2026-11-01 12:23
版本更新 2026-11-01 12:23
雷达观测 2026-11-04 23:43
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

In the online Minimum cost Bipartite Perfect Matching with Delays (MBPMD) problem, $m$ requests and $m$ servers arrive over time in a metric space. An online algorithm has to match each request to a server and can postpone a matching decision by paying the delay cost. The objective is to minimize the total distance and delay cost. Azar, Chiplunkar, and Kaplan gave a randomized $O(\log n)$-competitive algorithm for metric spaces with $n$ points that are known in advance. For deterministic algorithms, however, the best known competitive ratio in general metric spaces was $O(m^{0.59})$, due to Azar and Jacob-Fanani. On the line, Kuo proposed the Virtual Robust Matching (VRM) algorithm and showed that it is $O(\sqrt{m}\log^2 m)$-competitive. We prove that VRM is $O(\log m)$-competitive for the MBPMD problem in any metric space. VRM is deterministic and does not need to know the metric space or $m$ in advance. It is the first deterministic polylogarithmic-competitive algorithm for the MBPMD problem in general metric spaces. Unlike the previous analysis of VRM, our analysis does not rely on a geometric decomposition of the metric space. Instead, it charges the waiting time of requests over time to the edges of a fixed optimal matching. We also extend VRM to the non-bipartite version and prove that the resulting deterministic algorithm is $O(\log m)$-competitive. This improves the $O(\log^5 m)$ bound of Dufay and Wattenhofer and matches a concurrent result of Ahmadian, Chawla, Kumar, Purohit, and Zhang. The proof that VRM is $O(\log m)$-competitive and its non-bipartite extension were found by GPT-6 Astra (OpenAI) with almost no human input. We used Claude Opus 5.5 (Anthropic) to simplify and present the results. See the AI Usage and Methodology section for details. We take full responsibility for this paper.

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-01 12:23 · 最新观测版本

A Deterministic O(log m)-Competitive Algorithm for Online Minimum Cost Bipartite Matching with Delays

In the online Minimum cost Bipartite Perfect Matching with Delays (MBPMD) problem, $m$ requests and $m$ servers arrive over time in a metric space. An online algorithm has to match each request to a server and can postpone a matching decision by paying the delay cost. The objective is to minimize the total distance and delay cost. Azar, Chiplunkar, and Kaplan gave a randomized $O(\log n)$-competitive algorithm for metric spaces with $n$ points that are known in advance. For deterministic algorithms, however, the best known competitive ratio in general metric spaces was $O(m^{0.59})$, due to Azar and Jacob-Fanani. On the line, Kuo proposed the Virtual Robust Matching (VRM) algorithm and showed that it is $O(\sqrt{m}\log^2 m)$-competitive. We prove that VRM is $O(\log m)$-competitive for the MBPMD problem in any metric space. VRM is deterministic and does not need to know the metric space or $m$ in advance. It is the first deterministic polylogarithmic-competitive algorithm for the MBPMD problem in general metric spaces. Unlike the previous analysis of VRM, our analysis does not rely on a geometric decomposition of the metric space. Instead, it charges the waiting time of requests over time to the edges of a fixed optimal matching. We also extend VRM to the non-bipartite version and prove that the resulting deterministic algorithm is $O(\log m)$-competitive. This improves the $O(\log^5 m)$ bound of Dufay and Wattenhofer and matches a concurrent result of Ahmadian, Chawla, Kumar, Purohit, and Zhang. The proof that VRM is $O(\log m)$-competitive and its non-bipartite extension were found by GPT-6 Astra (OpenAI) with almost no human input. We used Claude Opus 5.5 (Anthropic) to simplify and present the results. See the AI Usage and Methodology section for details. We take full responsibility for this paper.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗