跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.01625 · v1

Classification of non-Leibnizian Strings

首次提交 2026-11-01 14:18
版本更新 2026-11-01 14:18
雷达观测 2026-11-04 23:43
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Leibnizian ideas in foundations of physics has enjoyed a renewed interest. Cyclic string ontology in Wolfram Model multiway rewriting systems has been found to encode finite dimensional quantum systems where what are called as Leibnizian strings have been employed. It has then become important to classify strings in terms of their ability to correspond to a monadic interpretation à la Leibniz. The definition of Leibnizian strings are rather quite non-linear and for that purpose we classify non-Leibnizian strings for which there is a simpler criterion on maximal neighborhoods of characters. If a string is not non-Leibnizian then it must be Leibnizian. We found out three canonical forms of non-Leibnizian strings and noted that two of them are context-free languages whereas one is not.

作者备注:12 pages, 1 figure. Accepted for publication in Complex Systems

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-01 14:18 · 最新观测版本

Classification of non-Leibnizian Strings

Leibnizian ideas in foundations of physics has enjoyed a renewed interest. Cyclic string ontology in Wolfram Model multiway rewriting systems has been found to encode finite dimensional quantum systems where what are called as Leibnizian strings have been employed. It has then become important to classify strings in terms of their ability to correspond to a monadic interpretation à la Leibniz. The definition of Leibnizian strings are rather quite non-linear and for that purpose we classify non-Leibnizian strings for which there is a simpler criterion on maximal neighborhoods of characters. If a string is not non-Leibnizian then it must be Leibnizian. We found out three canonical forms of non-Leibnizian strings and noted that two of them are context-free languages whereas one is not.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗