跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.02045 · v1

METER: Matched-Event Calibration for Short-Event EEG Microstate Transition Analysis

首次提交 2026-11-02 00:47
版本更新 2026-11-02 00:47
雷达观测 2026-11-04 23:43
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Short cognitive events contain unequal and often sparse transition evidence, so raw EEG microstate distances can reflect finite sampling rather than neural reconfiguration. We introduce METER (Matched-Event Transition Estimation against a Reference), a participant-relative framework that separates marginal occupancy from conditional next-state choice and evaluates each event against duration-conditioned events from a fixed participant-specific reference bank. METER-Jump integrates uncertainty in sparse target and reference transition tables, returning a randomized event rank for testing and a continuous standardized coordinate for association analysis. Using a reproducible three-state representation selected by spatial criteria, we evaluated METER with participant-fitted simulations, estimator ablations, map perturbations, and preprocessing sensitivities. Event-level false-positive rates were 0.044-0.056 across four heterogeneous null mechanisms. By contrast, global cutoffs learned under the participant-fitted null and transferred unchanged to other regimes produced false-positive rates from 0.004 under rare transitions to 0.234 under map perturbation; duration-conditioned ranks remained near 0.05. Detection probability was approximately 0.69 with fixed maps but fell to 0.22 after bootstrap-derived map-assignment perturbation. In 4,175 natural-reading events from 18 participants, no linguistic association survived multiplicity correction in the primary 30-ms analysis, although a 20-ms sensitivity changed one within-stream max-$T$ decision. METER therefore calibrates finite-event departures conditional on a defined microstate sequence, while map assignment, filtering, temporal smoothing, and reference construction remain separate sources of measurement uncertainty.

作者备注:36 pages. Supplementary material (16 pages) included as an ancillary file. Abdul Basit and Eklavya Tomar contributed equally

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-02 00:47 · 最新观测版本

METER: Matched-Event Calibration for Short-Event EEG Microstate Transition Analysis

Short cognitive events contain unequal and often sparse transition evidence, so raw EEG microstate distances can reflect finite sampling rather than neural reconfiguration. We introduce METER (Matched-Event Transition Estimation against a Reference), a participant-relative framework that separates marginal occupancy from conditional next-state choice and evaluates each event against duration-conditioned events from a fixed participant-specific reference bank. METER-Jump integrates uncertainty in sparse target and reference transition tables, returning a randomized event rank for testing and a continuous standardized coordinate for association analysis. Using a reproducible three-state representation selected by spatial criteria, we evaluated METER with participant-fitted simulations, estimator ablations, map perturbations, and preprocessing sensitivities. Event-level false-positive rates were 0.044-0.056 across four heterogeneous null mechanisms. By contrast, global cutoffs learned under the participant-fitted null and transferred unchanged to other regimes produced false-positive rates from 0.004 under rare transitions to 0.234 under map perturbation; duration-conditioned ranks remained near 0.05. Detection probability was approximately 0.69 with fixed maps but fell to 0.22 after bootstrap-derived map-assignment perturbation. In 4,175 natural-reading events from 18 participants, no linguistic association survived multiplicity correction in the primary 30-ms analysis, although a 20-ms sensitivity changed one within-stream max-$T$ decision. METER therefore calibrates finite-event departures conditional on a defined microstate sequence, while map assignment, filtering, temporal smoothing, and reference construction remain separate sources of measurement uncertainty.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗