跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.02310 · v1

Detect, Repair and Audit: A Hierarchical Multi-Agent Defense Against Adversarial Attacks in Energy Forecasting

首次提交 2026-11-02 08:00
版本更新 2026-11-02 08:00
雷达观测 2026-11-04 23:42
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Accurate electricity-demand forecasting is essential for the modern energy infrastructure. Recently, Times-Series Large Language Models (TS-LLMs) have emerged as a promising approach to forecasting more accurate demand from historical consumption data in zero- and few-shot settings, helping energy operators effectively plan supply and allocate energy resources. However, these models are vulnerable to compromised sensor inputs that can distort forecasts and lead to erroneous market orders or unnecessary load shedding. Existing defenses focus primarily on end-device forecasting, overlooking the distinct data-drift, latency, and audit requirements across energy infrastructure. To address this gap, we extract from major energy standards and regulatory frameworks a three-layer conceptual model that captures the security postures for each layer. Guided by this model, we develop a Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL) detector coupled with signal repair at local control centers, designed to mitigate distributional data drift through complementary feature-based detection and clean-reference-calibrated repair while meeting latency budgets. We further deploy an evidence-grounded LLM auditing agent with human-in-the-loop validation for audit-critical Virtual Power Plants (VPPs). In our evaluation, the best MARL configuration achieves an F1 score above 0.91 across all dataset-attack pairs, while signal repair reduces adversarial-to-clean input Relative Squared Error (RSE) by up to 83%. The few-shot auditor detects 77.78% of attacks in the Sherlock dataset. On the evaluated hardware, detection and repair require 7.95 ms on average, with a worst-observed latency of 14.50 ms, remaining within the local-center latency budget informed by IEEE 1646.

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-02 08:00 · 最新观测版本

Detect, Repair and Audit: A Hierarchical Multi-Agent Defense Against Adversarial Attacks in Energy Forecasting

Accurate electricity-demand forecasting is essential for the modern energy infrastructure. Recently, Times-Series Large Language Models (TS-LLMs) have emerged as a promising approach to forecasting more accurate demand from historical consumption data in zero- and few-shot settings, helping energy operators effectively plan supply and allocate energy resources. However, these models are vulnerable to compromised sensor inputs that can distort forecasts and lead to erroneous market orders or unnecessary load shedding. Existing defenses focus primarily on end-device forecasting, overlooking the distinct data-drift, latency, and audit requirements across energy infrastructure. To address this gap, we extract from major energy standards and regulatory frameworks a three-layer conceptual model that captures the security postures for each layer. Guided by this model, we develop a Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL) detector coupled with signal repair at local control centers, designed to mitigate distributional data drift through complementary feature-based detection and clean-reference-calibrated repair while meeting latency budgets. We further deploy an evidence-grounded LLM auditing agent with human-in-the-loop validation for audit-critical Virtual Power Plants (VPPs). In our evaluation, the best MARL configuration achieves an F1 score above 0.91 across all dataset-attack pairs, while signal repair reduces adversarial-to-clean input Relative Squared Error (RSE) by up to 83%. The few-shot auditor detects 77.78% of attacks in the Sherlock dataset. On the evaluated hardware, detection and repair require 7.95 ms on average, with a worst-observed latency of 14.50 ms, remaining within the local-center latency budget informed by IEEE 1646.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗