跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.02380 · v1

Malware Clustering in the Wild: Taxonomy, Challenges, and Evaluation Metrics

首次提交 2026-11-02 09:47
版本更新 2026-11-02 09:47
雷达观测 2026-11-04 23:42
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

As malware continues to grow in volume, diversity, and sophistication, clustering has emerged as a critical technique for analyzing large malware corpora. Clustering enables the discovery of structural relationships, behavioral patterns, and evolutionary trends, and is widely used to group unknown samples, infer malware family boundaries, and identify novel variants. However, existing research remains fragmented, employing a wide range of clustering techniques with no unified perspective that systematically organizes prior work or clearly identifies gaps in the literature. This survey addresses this gap by organizing previous malware clustering research into seven categories: centroid-based, hierarchical-based, density-based, distribution-based, mixed- type, fuzzy, and AI-driven approaches. In addition, this survey summarizes publicly available malware datasets commonly used in clustering research and examines the feature representations derived from these datasets. Our goal is to clarify the current landscape and outline promising avenues for future research on malware clustering, including how AI-driven methods may shape large-scale and reproducible analysis.

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-02 09:47 · 最新观测版本

Malware Clustering in the Wild: Taxonomy, Challenges, and Evaluation Metrics

As malware continues to grow in volume, diversity, and sophistication, clustering has emerged as a critical technique for analyzing large malware corpora. Clustering enables the discovery of structural relationships, behavioral patterns, and evolutionary trends, and is widely used to group unknown samples, infer malware family boundaries, and identify novel variants. However, existing research remains fragmented, employing a wide range of clustering techniques with no unified perspective that systematically organizes prior work or clearly identifies gaps in the literature. This survey addresses this gap by organizing previous malware clustering research into seven categories: centroid-based, hierarchical-based, density-based, distribution-based, mixed- type, fuzzy, and AI-driven approaches. In addition, this survey summarizes publicly available malware datasets commonly used in clustering research and examines the feature representations derived from these datasets. Our goal is to clarify the current landscape and outline promising avenues for future research on malware clustering, including how AI-driven methods may shape large-scale and reproducible analysis.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗