跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.02392 · v1

A Sharp Mutual Information Bound for Binary Pairs

首次提交 2026-11-02 10:08
版本更新 2026-11-02 10:08
雷达观测 2026-11-04 23:42
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

We prove a sharp upper bound on the mutual information between two binary random variables in terms of their distribution-dependent KL contraction coefficient. This resolves the binary-pair conjecture of Anantharam, Gohari, Kamath, and Nair. Equality holds if and only if the variables are independent or form a doubly symmetric binary source. The proof uses supporting tangents of an entropy curve to vary the input distribution and the channel while preserving the contraction coefficient. Together with tensorization and data processing, the result also bounds the mutual information between binary outputs obtained separately from two correlated observation sequences. When the observation pairs are independent copies of a finite-alphabet pair, this bound depends only on the law of one pair and not on the number of observations.

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-02 10:08 · 最新观测版本

A Sharp Mutual Information Bound for Binary Pairs

We prove a sharp upper bound on the mutual information between two binary random variables in terms of their distribution-dependent KL contraction coefficient. This resolves the binary-pair conjecture of Anantharam, Gohari, Kamath, and Nair. Equality holds if and only if the variables are independent or form a doubly symmetric binary source. The proof uses supporting tangents of an entropy curve to vary the input distribution and the channel while preserving the contraction coefficient. Together with tensorization and data processing, the result also bounds the mutual information between binary outputs obtained separately from two correlated observation sequences. When the observation pairs are independent copies of a finite-alphabet pair, this bound depends only on the law of one pair and not on the number of observations.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗