← 研踪 PaperTrailarXiv:2611.02892 · v1
JABER: Sequential Quality Control for Human-AI Data Annotation under Shared Bias
首次提交 2026-11-02 18:25
版本更新 2026-11-02 18:25
雷达观测 2026-11-04 23:42
摘要
High-quality annotations are essential for training and evaluating artificial intelligence (AI) systems. Quality control (QC) often acquires additional human or AI judgments before accepting a label. Nevertheless, shared biases can cause correlated judgments, leading conventional methods to mistake repeated agreement for independent evidence of correctness. To address this challenge, we propose JABER (Joint Alias-Preserving Belief for Evidence Routing), a bias-aware sequential QC framework that maintains a joint Bayesian posterior over label correctness and shared biases to guide evidence acquisition and termination decisions. Building on this posterior, we develop a finite-horizon algorithm that selects evidence-acquisition and termination actions to minimize expected QC loss under resource constraints. Our theoretical analysis shows that conditional-independence updating can become arbitrarily confident in an incorrect label under persistent shared bias. We further identify when repeated inspections cannot distinguish a correct label from an incorrect label supported by shared bias, when obtaining a new label can resolve this ambiguity, and why modeling the dependence between label correctness and shared bias can be necessary for QC decisions. Our experiments show that JABER reduces expected QC loss by an average of 4.65% compared with a method maintaining separate label correctness and bias probabilities when shared bias makes repeated inspections unreliable. Further, JABER's finite-horizon planning, which evaluates outcomes of successive QC actions, reduces expected QC loss by an average of 10.05% compared with a one-step lookahead method. In real-API experiments on FEVER, JABER achieves zero labeling errors while reducing QC costs by 2.67% and 16.99% compared with marginal-based belief modeling and one-step lookahead methods, respectively.
观测到的版本
相邻记录可能跳过中间版本；首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。
v1 · 2026-11-02 18:25 · 最新观测版本
JABER: Sequential Quality Control for Human-AI Data Annotation under Shared Bias
High-quality annotations are essential for training and evaluating artificial intelligence (AI) systems. Quality control (QC) often acquires additional human or AI judgments before accepting a label. Nevertheless, shared biases can cause correlated judgments, leading conventional methods to mistake repeated agreement for independent evidence of correctness. To address this challenge, we propose JABER (Joint Alias-Preserving Belief for Evidence Routing), a bias-aware sequential QC framework that maintains a joint Bayesian posterior over label correctness and shared biases to guide evidence acquisition and termination decisions. Building on this posterior, we develop a finite-horizon algorithm that selects evidence-acquisition and termination actions to minimize expected QC loss under resource constraints. Our theoretical analysis shows that conditional-independence updating can become arbitrarily confident in an incorrect label under persistent shared bias. We further identify when repeated inspections cannot distinguish a correct label from an incorrect label supported by shared bias, when obtaining a new label can resolve this ambiguity, and why modeling the dependence between label correctness and shared bias can be necessary for QC decisions. Our experiments show that JABER reduces expected QC loss by an average of 4.65% compared with a method maintaining separate label correctness and bias probabilities when shared bias makes repeated inspections unreliable. Further, JABER's finite-horizon planning, which evaluates outcomes of successive QC actions, reduces expected QC loss by an average of 10.05% compared with a one-step lookahead method. In real-API experiments on FEVER, JABER achieves zero labeling errors while reducing QC costs by 2.67% and 16.99% compared with marginal-based belief modeling and one-step lookahead methods, respectively.
查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗