← 研踪 PaperTrailarXiv:2611.02966 · v1
SHq: Learnable Grids for LLM Weight Quantization
首次提交 2026-11-02 19:35
版本更新 2026-11-02 19:35
雷达观测 2026-11-04 23:42
摘要
Block-scaled lookup-table (LUT) formats, which represent weights as indices into a small value set (the grid), have become standard for low-bit LLM quantization, ranging from NF4 and BOF4 to the 3-bit LUT instruction in NVIDIA Rubin. While these formats leave the grid definition flexible, existing implementations rely on fixed grids derived either from numerical data types (INT, FP) or assumed weight distributions (NF, BOF). We demonstrate that no single fixed grid is universally optimal; the best fixed grid varies with bit-width: BOFS at 2 bits, NF at 4 and 5 bits, and INT at 6 bits. We introduce SHq, a closed-form family of grids parameterized by two critical degrees of freedom: a companding strength α that interpolates level spacing from uniform to floating-point-like, and an offset c that introduces asymmetry. This offset allows the sign bit of the FP8 block scale, otherwise unused, to select between the grid and its mirror image, up to doubling the number of distinct values available per block. SHq modifies only the lookup table contents and serves as a drop-in replacement for the grid in any such format. Across five models ranging from 3B to 35B parameters, including a mixture-of-experts architecture, evaluated at 2-6 bits using RTN and GPTQ, SHq achieves the lowest KL divergence in every setting at 3 and 4 bits and in most settings at 2, 5 and 6 bits. It outperforms the best fixed grid by up to 34% and remains superior under mixed-precision configurations. At 4.5 bits per weight, the SHq format reduces the KL divergence of NVFP4 by 41-67% while improving downstream accuracy. Grid families incorporating both spacing and offset parameters perform comparably, whereas those lacking an offset exhibit clearly higher error, confirming that these two degrees of freedom drive the observed gains. We therefore propose SHq as the standard grid for block-scaled lookup-table formats.
观测到的版本
相邻记录可能跳过中间版本；首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。
v1 · 2026-11-02 19:35 · 最新观测版本
SHq: Learnable Grids for LLM Weight Quantization
Block-scaled lookup-table (LUT) formats, which represent weights as indices into a small value set (the grid), have become standard for low-bit LLM quantization, ranging from NF4 and BOF4 to the 3-bit LUT instruction in NVIDIA Rubin. While these formats leave the grid definition flexible, existing implementations rely on fixed grids derived either from numerical data types (INT, FP) or assumed weight distributions (NF, BOF). We demonstrate that no single fixed grid is universally optimal; the best fixed grid varies with bit-width: BOFS at 2 bits, NF at 4 and 5 bits, and INT at 6 bits. We introduce SHq, a closed-form family of grids parameterized by two critical degrees of freedom: a companding strength α that interpolates level spacing from uniform to floating-point-like, and an offset c that introduces asymmetry. This offset allows the sign bit of the FP8 block scale, otherwise unused, to select between the grid and its mirror image, up to doubling the number of distinct values available per block. SHq modifies only the lookup table contents and serves as a drop-in replacement for the grid in any such format. Across five models ranging from 3B to 35B parameters, including a mixture-of-experts architecture, evaluated at 2-6 bits using RTN and GPTQ, SHq achieves the lowest KL divergence in every setting at 3 and 4 bits and in most settings at 2, 5 and 6 bits. It outperforms the best fixed grid by up to 34% and remains superior under mixed-precision configurations. At 4.5 bits per weight, the SHq format reduces the KL divergence of NVFP4 by 41-67% while improving downstream accuracy. Grid families incorporating both spacing and offset parameters perform comparably, whereas those lacking an offset exhibit clearly higher error, confirming that these two degrees of freedom drive the observed gains. We therefore propose SHq as the standard grid for block-scaled lookup-table formats.
查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗