跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.03128 · v1

Belief Propagation-Informed Tesseract Decoding of Quantum LDPC Codes

首次提交 2026-11-02 21:42
版本更新 2026-11-02 21:42
雷达观测 2026-11-04 23:41
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

In quantum error correction, the decoder must estimate the errors from the measurement data accurately and fast enough to avoid a backlog. Search-based decoders such as Tesseract achieve high accuracy by finding a minimum-weight set of error events with an A* search, but their search effort grows rapidly with the physical error rate and the code size. To reduce this search effort while maintaining a logical error rate close to that of Tesseract, we propose a belief propagation (BP)-guided modification of the Tesseract decoder for quantum low-density parity-check (LDPC) codes. Damped sum-product BP is applied to the triggered detectors before the Tesseract search. If the detectors triggered by the BP hard decision match the triggered detectors, this hard decision is accepted directly, and the Tesseract search is skipped. Otherwise, the BP marginal probability estimates, weighted by a trust coefficient, modify the search priority, while the path cost keeps the channel-prior weights so that the decoding objective is unchanged. The framework also supports BP-based initialization, in which selected BP decisions form the starting point of a residual search whose signed-cost objective allows incorrect initial decisions to be removed. A node-exploration limit bounds this residual search; if the limit is reached, the decoder falls back to the BP-guided search on the original triggered detector set. The method is evaluated on the [[72,12,6]], [[90,8,10]], and [[144,12,12]] bivariate bicycle codes under circuit-level noise. With BP-based initialization and a global trust coefficient, the number of Tesseract search nodes expanded is reduced by up to more than two orders of magnitude at low physical error rates, while the logical error rate remains close to that of Tesseract.

作者备注:12 pages, 4 figures, 5 tables. Submitted to IEEE Transactions on Quantum Engineering

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-02 21:42 · 最新观测版本

Belief Propagation-Informed Tesseract Decoding of Quantum LDPC Codes

In quantum error correction, the decoder must estimate the errors from the measurement data accurately and fast enough to avoid a backlog. Search-based decoders such as Tesseract achieve high accuracy by finding a minimum-weight set of error events with an A* search, but their search effort grows rapidly with the physical error rate and the code size. To reduce this search effort while maintaining a logical error rate close to that of Tesseract, we propose a belief propagation (BP)-guided modification of the Tesseract decoder for quantum low-density parity-check (LDPC) codes. Damped sum-product BP is applied to the triggered detectors before the Tesseract search. If the detectors triggered by the BP hard decision match the triggered detectors, this hard decision is accepted directly, and the Tesseract search is skipped. Otherwise, the BP marginal probability estimates, weighted by a trust coefficient, modify the search priority, while the path cost keeps the channel-prior weights so that the decoding objective is unchanged. The framework also supports BP-based initialization, in which selected BP decisions form the starting point of a residual search whose signed-cost objective allows incorrect initial decisions to be removed. A node-exploration limit bounds this residual search; if the limit is reached, the decoder falls back to the BP-guided search on the original triggered detector set. The method is evaluated on the [[72,12,6]], [[90,8,10]], and [[144,12,12]] bivariate bicycle codes under circuit-level noise. With BP-based initialization and a global trust coefficient, the number of Tesseract search nodes expanded is reduced by up to more than two orders of magnitude at low physical error rates, while the logical error rate remains close to that of Tesseract.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗