跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.03397 · v1

Online Algorithms Cannot Find Isolated Perceptron Solutions

首次提交 2026-11-03 00:30
版本更新 2026-11-03 00:30
雷达观测 2026-11-04 23:41
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

The binary perceptron problem asks for a length-$n$ sign vector in the intersection of $\lfloor αn\rfloor$-many independent random Gaussian half-spaces. A striking feature of this model is strong freezing: at every constraint density $α> 0$, all but a vanishing fraction of solutions are isolated -- $Ω(n)$-far from all others, in Hamming distance. Such solutions are believed to be algorithmically inaccessible. Nevertheless, efficient algorithms find solutions at some constraint densities $α$. One possible resolution of this apparent contradiction is that the solution space also contains rare well-connected structures, and that algorithms succeed by locating them. Gong, Huang, Li and Sellke (FOCS 2026) proved this for stable algorithms, by showing that such algorithms cannot locate isolated solutions with probability more than $\approx 0.84$. In this work, we study online algorithms, which receive the columns of the constraint matrix one by one and sign each irrevocably upon arrival. This is a widely used class of algorithms in discrepancy minimization, and it includes the algorithm of Jo and Lee (2026), which has one of the best provable guarantees for the binary perceptron. We prove that at any constraint density, any online algorithm outputs an isolated solution with probability $o(1)$. Our proof is based on the observation that the signs an online algorithm has already fixed can be completed to at most one isolated solution, so a successful algorithm must choose the unique correct sign for each of the last few columns. Using the exchangeability of these columns, we show that such an algorithm must match a suffix-parallel baseline, which signs each of them as if it were the next column to arrive. We then use an anti-concentration argument to show that such a baseline rarely produces a unique completion.

作者备注:33 pages, 5 figures

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-03 00:30 · 最新观测版本

Online Algorithms Cannot Find Isolated Perceptron Solutions

The binary perceptron problem asks for a length-$n$ sign vector in the intersection of $\lfloor αn\rfloor$-many independent random Gaussian half-spaces. A striking feature of this model is strong freezing: at every constraint density $α> 0$, all but a vanishing fraction of solutions are isolated -- $Ω(n)$-far from all others, in Hamming distance. Such solutions are believed to be algorithmically inaccessible. Nevertheless, efficient algorithms find solutions at some constraint densities $α$. One possible resolution of this apparent contradiction is that the solution space also contains rare well-connected structures, and that algorithms succeed by locating them. Gong, Huang, Li and Sellke (FOCS 2026) proved this for stable algorithms, by showing that such algorithms cannot locate isolated solutions with probability more than $\approx 0.84$. In this work, we study online algorithms, which receive the columns of the constraint matrix one by one and sign each irrevocably upon arrival. This is a widely used class of algorithms in discrepancy minimization, and it includes the algorithm of Jo and Lee (2026), which has one of the best provable guarantees for the binary perceptron. We prove that at any constraint density, any online algorithm outputs an isolated solution with probability $o(1)$. Our proof is based on the observation that the signs an online algorithm has already fixed can be completed to at most one isolated solution, so a successful algorithm must choose the unique correct sign for each of the last few columns. Using the exchangeability of these columns, we show that such an algorithm must match a suffix-parallel baseline, which signs each of them as if it were the next column to arrive. We then use an anti-concentration argument to show that such a baseline rarely produces a unique completion.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗