跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.03509 · v1

Attacking P2P Networks: Liveness Attacks on the GossipSub and DOG Gossip Protocols

首次提交 2026-11-03 01:46
版本更新 2026-11-03 01:46
雷达观测 2026-11-04 23:41
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Peer-to-peer (P2P) networks form the communication layer of large decentralized systems such as Ethereum, and the correctness of higher-level protocols depends on the gossip layer delivering messages to honest nodes. We study the robustness of two gossip protocols against adversaries whose only goal is to violate liveness, that is, to prevent honest nodes from receiving fresh messages, without forging, altering, or invalidating any message. For GossipSub, the publish-subscribe protocol used by Ethereum, we show that an adversary operating a constant number of geographically distributed nodes with a fixed latency advantage can take over the ``First Message Deliveries'' peer-scoring term and separate a constant fraction of nodes from the honest mesh. We analyze the attack under a geographical model, address the random-peer and outbound-connection mechanisms, and show that the separation can be maintained under realistic churn. For DOG, a transaction-dissemination protocol designed for CometBFT, we first give simple counterexamples in which route filtering disconnects the dissemination graph even without failures or Byzantine participants, and then present a practical attack that uses only a single physical node with a constant number of identities and legitimate actions to disable every forwarding route, separating the full network while allowing only direct publisher-to-neighbor delivery. We verify the attack in a simulated network and analyze its cost, assumptions, and possible mitigations.

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-03 01:46 · 最新观测版本

Attacking P2P Networks: Liveness Attacks on the GossipSub and DOG Gossip Protocols

Peer-to-peer (P2P) networks form the communication layer of large decentralized systems such as Ethereum, and the correctness of higher-level protocols depends on the gossip layer delivering messages to honest nodes. We study the robustness of two gossip protocols against adversaries whose only goal is to violate liveness, that is, to prevent honest nodes from receiving fresh messages, without forging, altering, or invalidating any message. For GossipSub, the publish-subscribe protocol used by Ethereum, we show that an adversary operating a constant number of geographically distributed nodes with a fixed latency advantage can take over the ``First Message Deliveries'' peer-scoring term and separate a constant fraction of nodes from the honest mesh. We analyze the attack under a geographical model, address the random-peer and outbound-connection mechanisms, and show that the separation can be maintained under realistic churn. For DOG, a transaction-dissemination protocol designed for CometBFT, we first give simple counterexamples in which route filtering disconnects the dissemination graph even without failures or Byzantine participants, and then present a practical attack that uses only a single physical node with a constant number of identities and legitimate actions to disable every forwarding route, separating the full network while allowing only direct publisher-to-neighbor delivery. We verify the attack in a simulated network and analyze its cost, assumptions, and possible mitigations.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗